First off, people need to stop acting like De la Hoya was the same fighter since his first loss back in 99 to Trinidad. He was never the same fighter after. Especially after leaving Alcazar.
I bet you say that DLH is a credible win for Pacquiao though huh? Even though Pacquiao dragged him down to 147, you know...A weight he wasn't able to make anymore, nor didn't make since, yet again, the Trinidad fight. Which was almost 8 or 9 years before he signed to fight Pacquiao.
So yeah, DLH was done a while before and he was just riding out what he had left...But I think Mayweather got the better DLH.
Hatton was undefeated regardless, if he was so wack, how did the judges give him the vote, unanimous too?
Cotto had a rough time with Margarito and Pacquiao but he rebuilt himself and now look at him. It was a process but he bounced back and catapulted himself into something he never was before. Then he fought Mayweather, looking better than ever.
Really? Come on man.
I bet you say that DLH is a credible win for Pacquiao though huh? Even though Pacquiao dragged him down to 147, you know...A weight he wasn't able to make anymore, nor didn't make since, yet again, the Trinidad fight. Which was almost 8 or 9 years before he signed to fight Pacquiao.
So yeah, DLH was done a while before and he was just riding out what he had left...But I think Mayweather got the better DLH.
Hatton was undefeated regardless, if he was so wack, how did the judges give him the vote, unanimous too?
Cotto had a rough time with Margarito and Pacquiao but he rebuilt himself and now look at him. It was a process but he bounced back and catapulted himself into something he never was before. Then he fought Mayweather, looking better than ever.
Really? Come on man.
Comment