Im sorry Old school fighters are not automatically the best

[IMDAZED]

look at my avy and sig.ima great poster.oh let me go post in the history section.that way you cant argue with me................oh and i never boxed in my damn life so there you have it im a boxing historian

You could post 101 photos and even change your first name to Barney. You wouldn't know old school from squat. Aren't you the clown that said Shane Mosley's lightweight run craps on Azumah Nelson's career? Even Elie Sechbach laughed when he heard that. You're a ****ing joke.

[dan_cov]

look at my avy and sig.ima great poster.oh let me go post in the history section.that way you cant argue with me................oh and i never boxed in my damn life so there you have it im a boxing historian

Hahaha legend!

[F l i c k e r]

lololololololo, go for it Larry. I see exactly what you doin. Go in hard bruh.

[Barry Halls]

like with any sport, the newer generations will be faster, stronger, and smarter. thats just human evolution fellas.

I think you should contact leading researchers in the field. You've stumbled across something quite significant here.
Species apparently evolve noticeably within years, not hundreds of thousands as previously thought.

If athletes are better today than in the 50s it has NOTHING to do with gene evolution. It's about better techniques/approach in training, steroids and nutrition.

How does training differ from previous eras as it comes to boxing? How does Floyd Mayweather eat differently from Duran?
Because i could see many reasons for past eras fighters being better. Noticeably the sport attracting MORE and BETTER athletes than today and the fact that the competitive standards were higher. Iron sharpens iron etc.

[Russian Crushin]

Larrys bored as hell

[Paclan]

old avy=good poster

Puppy avi= Has a huge penis.

[IMDAZED]

You know what's amazing? How many times have you seen an old fighter take a youngin to school only to have his age fail him? Who remembers how much trouble Evander Holyfield had with Larry Holmes? And realizing (seeing an old HW king versus a new one) that the old HW king had skills fighters could only dream of? The difference today isn't in the skill. It's in the athleticism.

[dan_cov]

If you actually watch Pac vs Marquez 3 in b&w you'll see Pac easily won that fight.

[Tamis!]

LOL I think we're talking to Larry's son.

But I'm sure father and son are at the same wavelength anyways, with the father trying to catch up with the kid, so it's all good.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

I think you should contact leading researchers in the field. You've stumbled across something quite significant here.
Species apparently evolve noticeably within years, not hundreds of thousands as previously thought.

If athletes are better today than in the 50s it has NOTHING to do with gene evolution. It's about better techniques/approach in training, steroids and nutrition.

How does training differ from previous eras as it comes to boxing? How does Floyd Mayweather eat differently from Duran?
Because i could see many reasons for past eras fighters being better. Noticeably the sport attracting MORE and BETTER athletes than today and the fact that the competitive standards were higher. Iron sharpens iron etc.

it would be interesting to see how past greats would be in this era where sports and science and medicine are all intertwined