Not similar examples at all. The reason Lamont passed the first test was he wasn't tested under the same tests. I think the first time he was tested WADA and then the second test, the more strict test VADA caught him.
In Bertos case he was tested under the same company(or whatever you want to call them). He passed that test so it is pretty obvious with the small traces that it certainly would of been through contamination. This actually happens a lot of time in drug testing, that's why when testing positive it isn't black and white. Something like certain shampoos absorbed in the skin can cause a positive test.
IMO, when you weigh all the evidence it sounds like Berto is innocent. The fight should go on.
In Bertos case he was tested under the same company(or whatever you want to call them). He passed that test so it is pretty obvious with the small traces that it certainly would of been through contamination. This actually happens a lot of time in drug testing, that's why when testing positive it isn't black and white. Something like certain shampoos absorbed in the skin can cause a positive test.
IMO, when you weigh all the evidence it sounds like Berto is innocent. The fight should go on.
Comment