Why is it that when people compare Floyd or manny to past fighters?

[Poet682006]

I'm beginning to wonder what is happening lately as well. People seem to be completely out of their minds.

It's going to get worse though: All the Klitlickers are coming off their bans now and are about to flood NSB with their terminal ******ity

Poet

[Barry Halls]

It's going to get worse though: All the Klitlickers are coming off their bans now and are about to flood NSB with their terminal ******ity

Poet

And May/June is Floyd/Pac months.

Worst of all worlds as it relates to sane boxing discussions.

[Poet682006]

And May/June is Floyd/Pac months.

Worst of all worlds as it relates to sane boxing discussions.

Yep. This is where the nuthuggers go nuts and NSB gets spammed by hundreds of ******ed threads that amount to little more than verbal fellatio for said nuthuggers' favorite fighter :hypnotised9:

Poet

[The Big Dunn]

There isn't a single person denying they are ATGs, there are only people telling other people common sense, which is that Sugar Ray Leonard and Tommy Hearns are greater fighters that would beat them. Then we get accused of only favoring them because they are "in the past" which is the ******est crap someone could say.

Some ATGs are simply better than others and would kick the crap out of them. Accept that.

This is a good example of what the TS is posting about.

Look at your reasoning. "Common sense". Really? You may be right that Tommy or SRL would win. But "common sense" is a bull**** answer that attacks the poster rather than addresses their argument. Then a general statement that some ATG's would beat others. Well yeah thats true but it doesn't adress the posters question.

Can't anyone just answer a question on this board anymore?

[Barry Halls]

Are you looking for arguments as to why Hearns would beat the living **** out of Floyd or Pac at 147?

[bojangles1987]

This is a good example of what the TS is posting about.

Look at your reasoning. "Common sense". Really? You may be right that Tommy or SRL would win. But "common sense" is a bull**** answer that attacks the poster rather than addresses their argument. Then a general statement that some ATG's would beat others. Well yeah thats true but it doesn't adress the posters question.

Can't anyone just answer a question on this board anymore?

Many of us have already answered the question of what happens if Floyd and Pac fight the guys listed over and over and over and over. That's not even what the TS was asking, the whole point of his thread is to attack people who think some of the greatest welterweights of all time would beat two guys who are not among the greatest welterweights of all time. It is common sense that has been argued hundreds of times.

If he's going to attack us for being biased, if you are going to attack us for being biased, then we will attack back, because we are the ones that don't actually have bias, we have common sense that huge, ATG welterweights like Hearns or Leonard would beat the sh** out of two small guys like Floyd and Pacquiao. Sorry to burst your bubble.

[bojangles1987]

Are you looking for arguments as to why Hearns would beat the living **** out of Floyd or Pac at 147?

There are dozens upon dozens of threads with this topic if anyone was actually interested, but that isn't the point of the thread at all. It's just to attack people who favor older fighters as if we are biased to do so.

[The Big Dunn]

Are you looking for arguments as to why Hearns would beat the living **** out of Floyd or Pac at 147?

Respectfully, I saw your scoring for the floyd cotto fight so I tend to think whatever answer you give will be driven by your personal agenda.

That said Tommy has the jab, reach and power to destroy manny or floyd if he hit either one of them.

[IronDanHamza]

this is what posters do who have no argument.try to belittel you like they are just so much smarter than you.its hilarious

Is it? I've layed my arguments down on numerous occasions and most of the time you ignore it.

Like when you said Mosley's Lightweight run>>>Nelson's career and when asked how you could possibly come up with something so beyond ******ed it was ignored.

Same with a lot of things, like Nelson losing to Hernandez and Mayweather dominating Hernandez therefore Mayweather's Hernandez win >>>> Whitaker's Nelson win.

You're just clueless.

[al-Xander]

The older fighter typically wins like really wtf

In the case of Robinson vs mayweather or manny at 147 how much footage of Robinson there exist? For you to say he'd beat these two? Just because he one of the greatest doesn't mean he'd win...has he ever fought anybody with there style sets? And beat them? Is their footage to prove it?

Because some people are simply idiots. They love playing God. In reality, we simply don't know. To say that fighters from the past are superior is the most ****** thing you could ever assume. Humans are humans. The fighters of yesterday are no better nor worse than the fighters of today. That's why I never take idiots' opinions seriously.