Comments Thread For: Bradley Pondered Smacking Khan's Face in Confrontation

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • D4thincarnation
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 16198
    • 533
    • 260
    • 133,240

    #81
    Don't you hate guys like Bradley. Who talk tough after the event. You know the type that say if I would heard him say that I would have KHTFO, but when it went down he just stood there and walked away with his tail between his legs.


    Timmy it is not what you could have done, might have done if this happened or that didn't happen, it is what you do what make you what you are.

    And the Khan incident makes you a ***** and a ducker.

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #82
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      Once again, you think only short term. Do you simply think about your paycheck tomorrow? No. Yes, more lucrative because it promised more fights that would make the Khan one-off less lucrative. It's really not too difficult to understand...unless you choose to pretend everything is "duck" like a kid.
      If he had beaten Khan, he wouldn't have been offered multi-fight contracts?

      Derp!

      He took the multi-fight contract with TR exactly because he was thinking SHORT TERM. Get to that Pac fight as soon as possible whilst taking as least risk as possible.

      He was also offered a multi-fight deal by GBP. But refused it because they wanted him to fight Khan first! LOL.....every which way you turn, he ducked Khan.

      Comment

      • The Big Dunn
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 69375
        • 9,517
        • 7,853
        • 287,568

        #83
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        More lucrative? Fight Khan for 1.5m guranteed + 50% of the UK PPV money = more lucrative than fighting Casamyor for 1m.

        Going to the table with Pacquaio off the back of beating Khan and unifying the division = a stronger hand to get a more lucrative deal with Pacquaio

        Thats of course if he was confident about beating Khan.

        Which he wasn't. Hence....DUCK. Its quite simple.
        Dirk, there would be no Pac fight without the Casamayor fight. Tim's real options:

        1. Fight Khan for 1.5 mil and 50% ppv. Then promotional freedom.

        2. SIgn 2 fight deal with TR, Fight Casamayor for 1 mil (easy win) on Manny undercard which sets up Pac fight for $5 mil.

        There is no guarantee Bradley gets the pac fight if he beats Khan, even though I agree his negotiating position is better. He definitely doesn't get it with a loss.

        Unless you can guarantee beating khan means a floyhd fight, you have to take option 2 IMO.

        Comment

        • BoxingGenius27
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 8502
          • 370
          • 463
          • 9,603

          #84
          Originally posted by D4thincarnation
          Didn't Timmy also say "What if I lose" when asked about fighting Khan.

          If avoiding a fighter because you think you might lose is not ducking, I don't know what ducking is.
          How do you feel about avoiding tests?

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #85
            Originally posted by Big Dunn
            Dirk, there would be no Pac fight without the Casamayor fight. Tim's real options:

            1. Fight Khan for 1.5 mil and 50% ppv. Then promotional freedom.

            2. SIgn 2 fight deal with TR, Fight Casamayor for 1 mil (easy win) on Manny undercard which sets up Pac fight for $5 mil.

            There is no guarantee Bradley gets the pac fight if he beats Khan, even though I agree his negotiating position is better. He definitely doesn't get it with a loss.

            Unless you can guarantee beating khan means a floyhd fight, you have to take option 2 IMO.
            There was no guarantee he was getting it when he ducked Khan.

            He'd get offers from all over and almost certainly more lucrative ones had he beat Khan. Mayweather and Pacquaio especially are running out of opponents.

            It all boils down to whether he was confident about beating Khan.

            He wasn't. Hence Duck.

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #86
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              Haven't seen you in any of the threads but do a simple search for "Pacquaio" and "PEDs" and you're lame ass posts will be spamming up those ones, NO DOUBT!

              And I can only imagine your indignation had Khan tested positive! Oh lord! You'd shut down NSB on your own!
              You sound desperate. Here are just a couple examples. And of course you didn't see them. You think like a kid. You only see what you want to.



              Comment

              • D4thincarnation
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 16198
                • 533
                • 260
                • 133,240

                #87
                Originally posted by Big Dunn
                Dirk, there would be no Pac fight without the Casamayor fight. Tim's real options:

                1. Fight Khan for 1.5 mil and 50% ppv. Then promotional freedom.

                2. SIgn 2 fight deal with TR, Fight Casamayor for 1 mil (easy win) on Manny undercard which sets up Pac fight for $5 mil.

                There is no guarantee Bradley gets the pac fight if he beats Khan, even though I agree his negotiating position is better. He definitely doesn't get it with a loss.

                Unless you can guarantee beating khan means a floyhd fight, you have to take option 2 IMO.

                Sign with GBP to fight Khan take around 2m-2.5m and then fight Mayweather for around 8m plus a cut off PPV.

                Timmy's response: What if I lose to Khan.

                Ducking = Avoiding a fighter because you think you might lose.

                Timmy Ducked.

                FACT.

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #88
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  If he had beaten Khan, he wouldn't have been offered multi-fight contracts?

                  Derp!

                  He took the multi-fight contract with TR exactly because he was thinking SHORT TERM. Get to that Pac fight as soon as possible whilst taking as least risk as possible.

                  He was also offered a multi-fight deal by GBP. But refused it because they wanted him to fight Khan first! LOL.....every which way you turn, he ducked Khan.
                  Bradley's world doesn't revolve around Khan. What is wrong with you? Your line of thinking comes from such an obtuse angle. If you think taking the TR deal was a shorter term option than Khan then you're just not smart. In fact, the facts today prove your wrong.

                  Comment

                  • D4thincarnation
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 16198
                    • 533
                    • 260
                    • 133,240

                    #89
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    There was no guarantee he was getting it when he ducked Khan.

                    He'd get offers from all over and almost certainly more lucrative ones had he beat Khan. Mayweather and Pacquaio especially are running out of opponents.

                    It all boils down to whether he was confident about beating Khan.

                    He wasn't. Hence Duck.

                    As we know Bradley was not Pacquiao's first choice as an opponent, he was not even second choice.

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #90
                      Originally posted by IMDAZED
                      Bradley's world doesn't revolve around Khan. What is wrong with you? Your line of thinking comes from such an obtuse angle. If you think taking the TR deal was a shorter term option than Khan then you're just not smart. In fact, the facts today prove your wrong.
                      Thinking long term would be to get Khan out of the way and get offered an even more lucrative contract from a stronger negotiating position.

                      He said it himself in his TR press conference. He rejected the Golden Boy offer because they wanted him to fight Khan first. Try another excuse. Im sure you've got a list of them.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP