THE FLURRY: After Saturday, I Feel Confident Manny Beats Floyd

[Teri]

you must have reading comprehension problems you were the one that brought upp Ali and Foreman since you are too lazy to read I will copy and past
Ok let me explain...Manny has no jab....doesnt set up his power shots well which make him vulnerable to counters which he is too straight rights and right hooks...Mayweather's best punch....he doesnt defend the jab well, which Mayweather does throws well....

Also Manny isnt very good fighting on the inside or fighting backwards....Mayweather can do more in the ring, he can take the fight anywhere and have success, Manny cant....he is a bit more one dimensional....when he cant cut of the ring or hurt his opponent his doesnt know how to adjust...watch the first Morales fight, the Marquez fights, and he couldnt even cut the ring off on a 39 year old Mosley...Manny fights one way he is a mid range fighter...

.Also Mayweather is physically stronger and has shown in the past that he can up his punch output depending on the fighter in front of him...Mayweather has more options, I go with the more versatile guy


If anything you gotta at least acknowledge Mayweather adjust better on the fly than any fighter mid fight and on the top level its all about adjustments



ok so why and how do you think Manny wins? anything you post other than that Im not even gonna entertain because im so tired of talking in circles with you

whats up with this common stuff? hugh grant is gone lmao

[hugh grant]

You say Pac cant do this and cant do that, yet he wins. So Pacs not going to do this and not going to do that against Floyd, because he cant according to you, yet will win, its worked for him so far.

How will Floyd deal with what Pac throws though with his southpaw stance and power in both hands. Pac will nail Floyd with his straight left all night and if that dont land, then his right hooks will im sure. Can Floyd deal with the speed and power and combinations and angles.

[therealpugilist]

exactly what I expected...a fan boy that know nothing about boxing , at least he could give a reason why hia guy would win....he doesnt even believe Manny can beat Floyd

Mayweather is number one in my p4p list but IMO I would be shocked if he could beat Martinez, Paul Williams, or Lara...im a boxing fan not a fighters fan

[hugh grant]

exactly what I expected...a fan boy that know nothing about boxing , at least he could give a reason why hia guy would win....Mayweather is number one in my p4p list but IMO I would be shocked if he could beat Martinez, Paul Williams, or Lara...im a boxing fan not a fighters fan

Again your being a keyboard warriror and fantasing FLOYD will be able to do all this amazing stuff when he steps in the ring with Pac.

When Foreman was favourite against Ali, did people have to eloquently explain why Foreman would win with scientific theories?No, Ali barely beat Frasier and Foreman wrecked Frasier thats all the explanation you needed.

Foreman beat Frasier better than Ali and was a wrecking ball end of story, nuff said. Stop fantasing about Floyd can apparently do.

[Steven Adams]

after Marquez got robbed last year.. I cant believe these *******s are still trollin

[SpeedKillz]

Again your being a keyboard warriror and fantasing FLOYD will be able to do all this amazing stuff when he steps in the ring with Pac.

When Foreman was favourite against Ali, did people have to eloquently explain why Foreman would win with scientific theories?No, Ali barely beat Frasier and Foreman wrecked Frasier thats all the explanation you needed.

Foreman beat Frasier better than Ali and was a wrecking ball end of story, nuff said. Stop fantasing about Floyd can apparently do.

that string of floyd-pac / ali-foreman analogies made me legitimately upset that our beloved sport actually has people like this that claim to be "fans" and spread they're triangle theory bullshlt to casual fans and give the sport of boxing a bad name.

you are clearly a fan of ONE fighters and do not understand how boxing works, and by ducking a simple question (HOW would manny beat floyd?) you clearly prove therealpugilist's point that you merely HOPE that manny can beat floyd, just how you hope that everyone he faces does, and cause manny beat the guys that floyd beat in more dominating fashion, that somehow equates that manny would then beat floyd too, because pac beat his leftovers (his drained, old, or coming of a loss leftovers) and somehow you actually believe the bullshlt you post to be true. you sir, are an absolute joke.
you try to make yourself sound smart when you post, but thats only cause there are many on here like you, that are clueless about boxing. oh well...

[LoadedWraps]

Pac will be the best FLoyod has ever shared a ring with. They style match up will be bad for Floyd you could claim easily as well.

Foreman was favourtie against Ali as he destroyed Frasier. You could claim Ali was a bad style match up for Foreman whos footwork resembled the mummy and Ali floated like a butterfly, yet was underdog.
I think people are just a bit deluded when they put their money on floyd. By all means its up to you who you think will win, but the reasons are a bit weak.

Wrong. It doesn't go both ways.

[LoadedWraps]

that string of floyd-pac / ali-foreman analogies made me legitimately upset that our beloved sport actually has people like this that claim to be "fans" and spread they're triangle theory bullshlt to casual fans and give the sport of boxing a bad name.

you are clearly a fan of ONE fighters and do not understand how boxing works, and by ducking a simple question (HOW would manny beat floyd?) you clearly prove therealpugilist's point that you merely HOPE that manny can beat floyd, just how you hope that everyone he faces does, and cause manny beat the guys that floyd beat in more dominating fashion, that somehow equates that manny would then beat floyd too, because pac beat his leftovers (his drained, old, or coming of a loss leftovers) and somehow you actually believe the bullshlt you post to be true. you sir, are an absolute joke.
you try to make yourself sound smart when you post, but thats only cause there are many on here like you, that are clueless about boxing. oh well...

Green K for one of the best posts I have ever read on here!!!
Good job!!

[therealpugilist]

that string of floyd-pac / ali-foreman analogies made me legitimately upset that our beloved sport actually has people like this that claim to be "fans" and spread they're triangle theory bullshlt to casual fans and give the sport of boxing a bad name.

you are clearly a fan of ONE fighters and do not understand how boxing works, and by ducking a simple question (HOW would manny beat floyd?) you clearly prove therealpugilist's point that you merely HOPE that manny can beat floyd, just how you hope that everyone he faces does, and cause manny beat the guys that floyd beat in more dominating fashion, that somehow equates that manny would then beat floyd too, because pac beat his leftovers (his drained, old, or coming of a loss leftovers) and somehow you actually believe the bullshlt you post to be true. you sir, are an absolute joke.
you try to make yourself sound smart when you post, but thats only cause there are many on here like you, that are clueless about boxing. oh well...

damn couldnt have said it better myself

[therealpugilist]

Again your being a keyboard warriror and fantasing FLOYD will be able to do all this amazing stuff when he steps in the ring with Pac.

When Foreman was favourite against Ali, did people have to eloquently explain why Foreman would win with scientific theories?No, Ali barely beat Frasier and Foreman wrecked Frasier thats all the explanation you needed.

Foreman beat Frasier better than Ali and was a wrecking ball end of story, nuff said. Stop fantasing about Floyd can apparently do.

keyboard warrior rofl.....have you ever been in the ring boxing? I have and when they say its the loneliest place in the world its no lie....you dont even believe Pac can beat floyd end thread