Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Conte: Peterson Case Could Be Smart Method of Doping
Collapse
-
Originally posted by LA_2_Vegas View PostConte sounds like it would beneficial anyway to just continue pellets, cream, gel or whatever and just stay under 4:1 at all times.
I'm not sure if there is an assumption out there that is no effectiveness to being at or slightly below 4:1 because it's allowable within the rules. Normal men are supposed to be at a ratio of 1:1; so, any differences created artificially through PED's to bring you above 1:1 (or a slightly higher because you are a young professional athlete) would be seen as cheating.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View PostVery possible that he was cycling off, it all depends on dosage too though.
A guy the size of Overeem with the build he has, he was probably using straight Test E at a high dosage. The form of test Peterson was using hasn't been mentioned yet I don't think, but the dosage doesn't need to be too high to boost athletic peformance.
Lesnar just hasnt been caught
Comment
-
Originally posted by lyonheart View Postit wasnt synthetic testosterone. It was derived from soy. Didnt even bring his levels to a normal range. http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http...9jRLihKTVm9g0A check this out
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gino Ros View PostOvereeem and Lesnar were BOTH juicy.
Lesnar just hasnt been caught
Not in UFC though, I don't believe. He didn't have the muscle fullness or density that a juiced Lesnar had. Overeem, he has and has had the muscle fullness of a serious test user.
Comment
-
I'm not sure how to feel about this. Play devil's advocate, let's say he did go to the doctor and was diagnosed with low-T, which could be debilitating for a normal person, much less an athlete. Should he have to complete with low levels? Or would being prescribed something to bring him up to what is considered "normal" range, would that be okay? I understand the issue of cheating, but from the perspective of having to train and suffer poor recovery due to low-t, in a sense is that unfair as well. Not saying I side with Lamont, but don't be so quick to throw him under a bus either.Last edited by switchsouthpaw; 05-09-2012, 06:48 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by switchsouthpaw View PostI'm not sure how to feel about this. Play devil's advocate, let's say he did go to the doctor and was diagnosed with low-T, which could be debilitating for a normal, much less an athlete. Should he have to complete with low levels? Or would being prescribed something to bring him up to what is considered "normal" range, would that be okay? I understand the issue of cheating, but from the perspective of having to train and suffer poor recovery due to low-t, in a sense that is unfair as well. Not saying I side with Lamont, but don't be so quick to throw him under a bus either.
You men to tell me that you went to the doctor a few months ago, and he surgically implants something in your hip....and you forget?
GTFOH
Comment
Comment