Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Team Khan is Shocked With Peterson Testing Positive

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
    Who the **** are you, Pacquiao's public defender?
    Who the *** are you his number one closet fan? Or just an indecisive little weirdo who cant decide whether its Floyd's nob or Manny's that you want to give a hum job to?

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by junior gong View Post
      Who the *** are you his number one closet fan? Or just an indecisive little weirdo who cant decide whether its Floyd's nob or Manny's that you want to give a hum job to?
      Becareful or you are going to end up on INDAZED's presitigous ignore list.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by any craic lad? View Post
        Still a bit shocked too hear this.Peterson musta taken something accidently like you dont put yourself foward for a drug test like this one if your juicing since it's suppose to be very hard to beat.Anyway after all the hate i gave Floyd for continously *****ing about drug tests it really has done some good.Be great if it could become mandatory for Word title fights but the price would stand in the way for most off them
        Good post. I agree. Until the testing went into effect with a few fights it was impossible to see the value. I think the visibility has proven the haters wrong. No reason to even tie this to Floyd any longer. It is overdue and and good for the sport. By the way, I am very, very disappointed with Lamont. I will try to hold my judgement until we hear specifics.

        Comment


        • #44
          Two revealing observations so far on this thread:

          1) Floyd defenders are quick to condemn people who say that Peterson is guilty of using peds. These are the same people who accused Pac of the same infraction without a shred of evidence. No need to make any further comment.

          2) The peds on Peterson was discovered from a urine test, not blood test.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by junior gong View Post
            Who the *** are you his number one closet fan? Or just an indecisive little weirdo who cant decide whether its Floyd's nob or Manny's that you want to give a hum job to?
            Don't project, my **** friend. My post was about Peterson. Who brought up Pacquiao again? And why are you bringing up Floyd? See how you expose yourself, my little whore?

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by tatangb45 View Post
              Two revealing observations so far on this thread:

              1) Floyd defenders are quick to condemn people who say that Peterson is guilty of using peds. These are the same people who accused Pac of the same infraction without a shred of evidence. No need to make any further comment.

              2) The peds on Peterson was discovered from a urine test, not blood test.
              So not a slam but a question. We don't know if it is was PED's at this point do we? We just know it is a banned substance. Could this be Pot or ******* or something as well?

              The press statement is as confusing (to me) as it is shocking.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by tatangb45 View Post
                Two revealing observations so far on this thread:

                1) Floyd defenders are quick to condemn people who say that Peterson is guilty of using peds. These are the same people who accused Pac of the same infraction without a shred of evidence. No need to make any further comment.

                2) The peds on Peterson was discovered from a urine test, not blood test.
                There was no shred of evidence Peterson or any of the other busted athletes were on anything until AFTER they took the test.

                So, you're insinuating Pac should not take a random blood and urine test because there's no shred of evidence?

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by tatangb45 View Post
                  Two revealing observations so far on this thread:

                  1) Floyd defenders are quick to condemn people who say that Peterson is guilty of using peds. These are the same people who accused Pac of the same infraction without a shred of evidence. No need to make any further comment.

                  2) The peds on Peterson was discovered from a urine test, not blood test.
                  Peterson was caught by a test Pac's refused for several years.

                  Of course there won't be evidence when you refuse the dog on test lol

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
                    Peterson was caught by a test Pac's refused for several years.

                    Of course there won't be evidence when you refuse the dog on test lol
                    What Pac refused initially is unlimited blood tests, he wanted a cutoff before fight night.
                    Pac however have always agreed to unlimited random urine drug tests, which coincidentally what caught Peterson with his synthetic testosterone usage.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      LOL. All these fools that blamed or insinuated, recently or in the past, that Ariza gave Khan and Pacquiao performance enhancing drugs must have s*** all over their face. Isn't it ironic? LMAO. No wonder Peterson was so competitive against Khan, in terms of stamina, but he still doesn't have the punching power. So what does this say about all the Ariza, Roach, Pac, and Khan haters? They're Floyd kool-aid drinkers and delusional.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP