Comments Thread For: Team Khan is Shocked With Peterson Testing Positive
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Good post. I agree. Until the testing went into effect with a few fights it was impossible to see the value. I think the visibility has proven the haters wrong. No reason to even tie this to Floyd any longer. It is overdue and and good for the sport. By the way, I am very, very disappointed with Lamont. I will try to hold my judgement until we hear specifics.Still a bit shocked too hear this.Peterson musta taken something accidently like you dont put yourself foward for a drug test like this one if your juicing since it's suppose to be very hard to beat.Anyway after all the hate i gave Floyd for continously *****ing about drug tests it really has done some good.Be great if it could become mandatory for Word title fights but the price would stand in the way for most off themComment
-
Two revealing observations so far on this thread:
1) Floyd defenders are quick to condemn people who say that Peterson is guilty of using peds. These are the same people who accused Pac of the same infraction without a shred of evidence. No need to make any further comment.
2) The peds on Peterson was discovered from a urine test, not blood test.Comment
-
Don't project, my **** friend. My post was about Peterson. Who brought up Pacquiao again? And why are you bringing up Floyd? See how you expose yourself, my little whore?Comment
-
So not a slam but a question. We don't know if it is was PED's at this point do we? We just know it is a banned substance. Could this be Pot or ******* or something as well?Two revealing observations so far on this thread:
1) Floyd defenders are quick to condemn people who say that Peterson is guilty of using peds. These are the same people who accused Pac of the same infraction without a shred of evidence. No need to make any further comment.
2) The peds on Peterson was discovered from a urine test, not blood test.
The press statement is as confusing (to me) as it is shocking.Comment
-
There was no shred of evidence Peterson or any of the other busted athletes were on anything until AFTER they took the test.Two revealing observations so far on this thread:
1) Floyd defenders are quick to condemn people who say that Peterson is guilty of using peds. These are the same people who accused Pac of the same infraction without a shred of evidence. No need to make any further comment.
2) The peds on Peterson was discovered from a urine test, not blood test.
So, you're insinuating Pac should not take a random blood and urine test because there's no shred of evidence?Comment
-
Peterson was caught by a test Pac's refused for several years.Two revealing observations so far on this thread:
1) Floyd defenders are quick to condemn people who say that Peterson is guilty of using peds. These are the same people who accused Pac of the same infraction without a shred of evidence. No need to make any further comment.
2) The peds on Peterson was discovered from a urine test, not blood test.
Of course there won't be evidence when you refuse the dog on test lolComment
-
What Pac refused initially is unlimited blood tests, he wanted a cutoff before fight night.
Pac however have always agreed to unlimited random urine drug tests, which coincidentally what caught Peterson with his synthetic testosterone usage.Comment
-
LOL. All these fools that blamed or insinuated, recently or in the past, that Ariza gave Khan and Pacquiao performance enhancing drugs must have s*** all over their face. Isn't it ironic? LMAO. No wonder Peterson was so competitive against Khan, in terms of stamina, but he still doesn't have the punching power. So what does this say about all the Ariza, Roach, Pac, and Khan haters? They're Floyd kool-aid drinkers and delusional.Comment

Comment