Comments Thread For: Team Cotto: We Proved Mayweather is Not Invincible!

[BIGBOXINGFAN]

Im surprised you can speak with mayweather's *** so far down your throat.

Article says they thought the scores were too wide, cotto put in a great effort, and quintanas trainer thought the scores were too wide aswell. Says nothing about cotto thinking he won, maybe he does, but more relevant is the judges (and announcers/compubox) took a shat all over the work that cotto did in the ring, and had been putting in for months, etc.

You proceed to say cotto thinks he was robbed/won, and that you can read. trolololol.

Now i ask myself why im even responding to a red.

You responded so STFU...
What does being red have to do with it?
Your green and you still post dumb *****.

[Andyreww]

No, it's been said for some time he doesn't have the same mobility he used to.

Against Mosley he stood toe to toe, against Ortiz he stood toe to toe, it was no surprise when he did the same against Cotto.

There were times during the fight when Floyd tried to move away but wasn't quick enough and Cotto (literally) pulled him back in against the ropes with his left arm.

To re-iterate I thought Mayweather dominated a tough fight.

There's no shame in Mayweather fans conceding it was a tough fight, in fact there's more credit in winning a tough fight toe to toe, than an easy one moving around but it's delusion to claim the latter option was open to him on this occasion. If Mayweather could have made it easier for himself, he would have.

The whole "Mobility" thing is really just bull**** to be fair... You don't lose your legs in a year. watch him against Marquez, it's a new style that he's employed and he moved about against cotto and when he did cotto found it very hard to get to him.

He's 35 not 55.

[~AK49~]

You responded so STFU...
What does being red have to do with it? Your green and you still post dumb *****.

Means im not the first to have found your posts to be incredibly insightful...

[Gino Ros]

No, it's been said for some time he doesn't have the same mobility he used to.

Against Mosley he stood toe to toe, against Ortiz he stood toe to toe, it was no surprise when he did the same against Cotto.

There were times during the fight when Floyd tried to move away but wasn't quick enough and Cotto (literally) pulled him back in against the ropes with his left arm.

To re-iterate I thought Mayweather dominated a tough fight.

There's no shame in Mayweather fans conceding it was a tough fight, in fact there's more credit in winning a tough fight toe to toe, than an easy one moving around but it's delusion to claim the latter option was open to him on this occasion. If Mayweather could have made it easier for himself, he would have.

I saw it exactly the same way. And I've stated that repeatedly. No worries.

It is not delusional because that is exactly what he did to Cotto in the championship rounds. Cheers.

[BIGBOXINGFAN]

I didnt give miguel round 7. I thought the closest rounds that could have gone either way were 2 and 5 ( i gave 2 to miguel and 5 to may). Round 7 was close, not as close as 2 or 5 and i gave it to may.

I also gave round 3 to miguel, compubox was a joke in that round. It was a give and take round, one in which i couldnt complain too much about giving to mayweather, but cotto did do effective work in that round, landing many hard jabs and good body work, both left and right hooks.

All in all, i wont complain about a 9-3 scorecard, but a 10-2 scorecard, ya i will. Thats seeing the fight entirely through mayweather goggles.

It don't matter what you scored it. Cotto loss a UD so STFU.

[solo20]

They are trying to play the JMM vs Pac 3 card but the only diffrence is that you can make a case for JMM winning but in Cotto case you cant i only gave Cotto 3 rounds max

[BIGBOXINGFAN]

Means im not the first to have found your posts to be incredibly insightful...

You should know that *******s red anybody with something good to say about Mayweather.

So the red and green crap means nothing.
You act like all green posters are insightful...........yeah right

[bojangles1987]

Here's the problem:

Bradley is built and physicall strong. But does he REALLY know how to fight inside? To me, Tim does "a Hatton". He puts his head on your chest and throws a lot of punches to your body and head and he uses his head *******ly.

That works against guys like Junior Witter and Devon Alexander who are not rugged, and who don't know how to fight inside.

That isht would not work against a Mayweather or Hopkins (for example). those are old-school guys who know how to use leverage, elbows, body position, etc.

Look at Floyd inside. He pushes you aside slightly. Locks up your arm. Digs a couple of body shots. Hugs you. Lets you go. Hits you with an upper cut. Then gives you an elbow in the neck for good measure.

Bradley is not a technical inside fighter, He is an energy inside fighter.

Bradley is a very good inside fighter, one of the better inside fighters in the sport. He and Peterson had some tremendous inside fighting when they fought.

[sicko]

Timothy Bradley won't be physically stronger than Mayweather at 147. No way, no way at all.

well we may never know, but Bradley while he doesn't have great Power, physically he is VERY STRONG fighter

[~AK49~]

You responded so STFU...
What does being red have to do with it?
Your green and you still post dumb *****.

It don't matter what you scored it. Cotto loss a UD so STFU.

You should know that *******s red anybody with something good to say about Mayweather.

So the red and green crap means nothing.
You act like all green posters are insightful...........yeah right