Comments Thread For: Team Cotto: We Proved Mayweather is Not Invincible!

[The Big Dunn]

How can there possibly be a debate as to who won this fight? There was maybe 1 "close round". Miguel won 6,8,9 clearly. He lost every other round, except maybe 7.

[Money_May]

I had it the same as 2 judges 117-111 wouldn't have been mad if it was 116-112. But that's about it Cotto won MAX 4 rounds

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

When in doubt on the net, always correct someones english. The argument of internet losers for years.

I guess the same can be said for name calling then. When in reality you wouldn't dare say that to ANYBODY'S face.

[ELHURACAN58]

Man they should score every fight 115-113 for the winner, regardless of how close or wide the fight really was.

That way we wont have people saying "Well we got our butts handed to us but what the heck was up with that wide score?"

[BMWM3P]

U guys complain about the judges cards but it seems most ppl had it the same way.

You mean most nuthuggers like yourself. Cotto deserved no less than four rounds and I gave him 5.

[V.WEBB]

You mean most nuthuggers like yourself. Cotto deserved no less than four rounds and I gave him 5.

Which 5 did you give him?

[Gino Ros]

Sooooo, Miguel won a moral victory?

[Kagami Taiga]

You mean most nuthuggers like yourself. Cotto deserved no less than four rounds and I gave him 5.

No, I mean the press scores from around the nation. Please go back into hiding.

[Discipline]

You mean most nuthuggers like yourself. Cotto deserved no less than four rounds and I gave him 5.

Name the 5 rounds you gave to Cotto

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

This "you have to take the title from the champ" **** is one of the most overused and meaningless phrases in boxing.

First of all, its bull****. Second, it doesnt even apply to this fight because one guy CLEARLY won. And third, the belt was an afterthought. Nobody gave a *** that Cotto was a title holder.

Nobody is arguing that Floyd won but 9-2 rounds? NOW that's bulls1t my friend.