1 thing i have noticed bout Cotto fans and appreciate

[Bushbaby]

I'm wavering, I've been spending all the time since the fight was announced talking up Bradley's chances, and now that the fight is a month away I'm chickening out.

I've been a Pacquiao fan too long, LOL.

That's fine, we don't want doubters on the Bradley Ram Mobile anyway, run along back to Packy now lol!!

[Walt Liquor]

You said Floyd should've fought him in 2006, instead of 2010. Implying that it was his fault. Then you said he didn't make a serious enough effort. Now you're saying it was Shane's fault.

Second...you implied he should've fought Hatton at 140 because of the lineal title Hatton had but then I'm assuming you believe he was right to fight Baldomir over Margarito, right? Same reasoning?

No i didnt, i said a shane win in 06 would hace been better than his shame win in 10. Strictly as an example for the pac fight being abetter win in 09 than in '13. You fools took it as a slight for god knows why (well i know why).



As far as the second part, dont make me laugh. Thats kids stuff and its beneath me. I know you think hatton would have been a better win at 140 cuz u've said it before.

Weak sauce, your whole post was ***in weak.

[bojangles1987]

That's fine, we don't want doubters on the Bradley Ram Mobile anyway, run along back to Packy now lol!!

Bradley Ram Mobile.

[Bushbaby]

No i didnt, i said a shane win in 06 would hace been better than his shame win in 10. Strictly as an example for the pac fight being abetter win in 09 than in '13. You fools took it as a slight for god knows why (well i know why).



As far as the second part, dont make me laugh. Thats kids stuff and its beneath me. I know you think hatton would have been a better win at 140 cuz u've said it before.

Weak sauce, your whole post was ***in weak.

Walt, let it go. No matter how much it's clear what you said, your words will be twisted. It's 1 of them treads. I know that saying "a win in 06 is better than a win in 2010", does not mean he ducked him in 06. It simply means an 06 win boss's on a 2010 win.

[Walt Liquor]

What?

Do you just make **** up?

When did I refute that?

I merely asked you to clarify the relevance of that statement and you've still yet to.

"06 shane is better than '10 shane"

Ok? And?

I did 10 times. Please learn how to read, last time...

Its comparing fighting pac in 09 to pac whenever floyd gets around to fighting him. Meaning he's fighting him too late. The shane case is a but more dramatic, but i used it to make a clear point that is waaaay over your head.

[Walt Liquor]

lol walt got groupie'd

Dudes are complete failures are reading comprehension.

[Walt Liquor]

Walt, let it go. No matter how much it's clear what you said, your words will be twisted. It's 1 of them treads. I know that saying "a win in 06 is better than a win in 2010", does not mean he ducked him in 06. It simply means an 06 win boss's on a 2010 win.

Its embarrassing for them. And in too of that it was only said to refer to the difference in a manny win in 09 vs whenever floyd finally fights him.


Fanboyism at its finest, and from great posters too. Wow.

[NChristo]

Too far.........

I went there, son.

[NChristo]

[IronDanHamza]

Dudes are complete failures are reading comprehension.

When you attack someone's reading comprehension you should make sure you have no grammatical mistakes in your post.