"Noooooooooooo! The Ring can't have a Brit as fighter of the year! Say it ain't so!!"

[Guest]

What about Mayweather? He got a belt in the same division and then moved up to beat someone who was way over the hill and without a belt.

Coralles? The way he got KTFO in four puts him above Hatton, surely?

What about Taylor getting a decision that no one believes he won anyway? FOTY 2005 material, surely?


If anyone can come up with a name of someone who achieved more in boxing during 2005 (beating a HOF and P4P fighter, plus half unifying their division) please suggest them urgently and e-mail The Ring magazine to let them know.

I can't stand the thought of a Brit winning! Boooooooo hooooooo!

[theironone]

its **** like this annie that gets you banned

[IwatchBoxing]

Miguel Cotto - fighter of the year, sorry man.

[theironone]

hatton does deserve it tho

[RAESAAD]

Brewster................

[restless_438]

Brewster................

he's good, but i feel like the heavyweight division was still on a 'self-destructive' level this year, i wouldn't give it to anyone in that division.

[Guest]

its **** like this annie that gets you banned

Shut it *****, I've got a hangover.

[EXIGE]

Hatton has had a great year. Mayweather. Erm sorry. Fighting bums doesnt make you fighter of the year.

Naz is gonna be next years fighter when he comes back and kicks some ass against Barr - who?

[theironone]

dont ****in drink shandy then dip****

[Easy-E]

the ring likes hatton alot, they will prob give him fighter of the year, but i think that if taylor beats bhop this time around it will be a toss up