I wanna try to be a little bit philosophical now. Look deeper into the sport of boxing. We all know most boxers came from a troubled background and a crappy childhood. Many of them got beaten as kids and/or abused in one way or the other. Or they were bullied and learned to defend themselves. Then I hear people like Bernard Hopkins say "he became who he is against all odds". He likes to say that he "turned his life around in prison". And that's when I start to think about what is true and what is not true. Did Hopkins really defy the odds? Because a real "winner" is somebody who breaks the cycle of violence. At least in my opinion.
Basically Hopkins is killing or trying to kill other human beings now inside a ring. Before prison he was doing the violence "illegally" outside of the ring. Not just Hopkins, so many others: Tyson, Bobby Chacon, Rocky Graziano, Rocky Marciano and many many others who later become "Hall of fame boxers".
Society allows violence inside a ring and pays both fighters sometimes lots of money so they try to kill each other.
I watch boxing just like all of you. But sometimes I think to myself- "is a guy like Bernard Hopkins really a winner in life?". According to society and the boxing community he probably is a "big winner". But he still carries all that hate and anger inside of him which he has since his youth and tries to focus all his aggression on a (random) opponent inside a squared circle. Legally, not illegally anymore. But in my opinion, violence is still violence.
I am not trying to downplay all the discipline, the diet, the struggle a boxer goes through. But there is a big part in me that doesn't believe guys like Bernard Hopkins when they say "I defied the odds".
Basically Hopkins is killing or trying to kill other human beings now inside a ring. Before prison he was doing the violence "illegally" outside of the ring. Not just Hopkins, so many others: Tyson, Bobby Chacon, Rocky Graziano, Rocky Marciano and many many others who later become "Hall of fame boxers".
Society allows violence inside a ring and pays both fighters sometimes lots of money so they try to kill each other.
I watch boxing just like all of you. But sometimes I think to myself- "is a guy like Bernard Hopkins really a winner in life?". According to society and the boxing community he probably is a "big winner". But he still carries all that hate and anger inside of him which he has since his youth and tries to focus all his aggression on a (random) opponent inside a squared circle. Legally, not illegally anymore. But in my opinion, violence is still violence.
I am not trying to downplay all the discipline, the diet, the struggle a boxer goes through. But there is a big part in me that doesn't believe guys like Bernard Hopkins when they say "I defied the odds".
Comment