If Floyd took every fight serious with no trash talk, I would respect him more

[4Corners]

5 straight wins against who? His only worthwhile win was against Berto and Berto is even more rubbish! He quit against a fighter as limited as Maidana and he's supposed to be seen as a challenge to Mayweather? He got ouboxed for half of the fight against Lamont yet he's supposed to be a legit opponent for Mayweather? Ok then...lol

And enough with worrying about how old I am, 4corners KID...lol. You're trying too hard.

I'm kid at heart, not in life though.When you grow up, you'll understand. Right now, I'm just hoping you make it to 18. I stick by what I said about you man, it's okay.

If that's the case, than I guess Khan shouldn't get a shot against Mayweather. He struggled with Lamont and got knocked the f**k out by Prescott, I guess he shouldn't fight Mayweather either.

Ortiz beat the #2 ranked WW at the time in Berto and should have got the W over Lamont, someone your boy can't put away convincingly either, and I had Khan winning that fight.

[4Corners]

What are you talking about? Hatton was both The Ring and the Lineal champion at 140, so he was THE man to beat, he was the champion at 140.

Bradley?


You do realize we're talking about May 2009 right? When Bradley's best win was Kendoll Holt. You realize this?

I realize that, but still, Hatton was not what he once was either man. Hatton in 2009 and Cotto right now are more or less in the same spot in their careers. And by that time, Bradley had beat Vazquez, Witter, and Holt, not too bad. Certainly better than anything Hatton had done since Urango or Tszyu.

Hatton in 2009 and Cotto right now, both past their prime-still good.

If you would have preferred Mayweather-Canelo to Mayweather-Cotto, that's your opinion.

[letsgobrady]

Do you consider Floyd's win over Ricky Hatton a great win?

it was a great win in the sense that ricky was undefeated and believe it or not was considered a great fighter and it was a fight once again believe it or not that many people wanted to see.ricky hatton has always been overrated to me but that doesn't seem to make a difference what makes a difference is what the majority or the loudest people think just like whats going n with kirkland right now i honestly think he is overrated but yet people wanna see him fight sergio so if sergio eventually fights kirkland beats him there should be no complaining because kirkland is looked at to many as a threat i guess to sergio

[ADP02]

why, u said this fight is no good whats the point of watching it

Possibly because he is still a fan of boxing but he doesn't think it's worth paying for ....

I'm in the same boat with this one .... but often I find a better way to watch it when the option is there.

[ADP02]

I realize that, but still, Hatton was not what he once was either man. Hatton in 2009 and Cotto right now are more or less in the same spot in their careers. And by that time, Bradley had beat Vazquez, Witter, and Holt, not too bad. Certainly better than anything Hatton had done since Urango or Tszyu.

Hatton in 2009 and Cotto right now, both past their prime-still good.

If you would have preferred Mayweather-Canelo to Mayweather-Cotto, that's your opinion.

Man that is almost like when I ask my kids to chose between doing their homework and eating vegetables that they don't like! Ok, not that bad but the point is it's Not much of a choice if you ask me .... sad that at this point in his career, he needs to be fighting those two ....

At this point in time, like Dirk stated in another post, its an event but nothing more ..... because we already know the outcome.

Cotto is a few years to late while Canelo will be too early into his career if Floyd fights him next.

[letsgobrady]

who did hatton beat at 140 after that wrestling match with tszyu?urango?besides that there were a couple of fighters ricky could have fought like holt,torres,witter,cotto and all those opponents had te ability to knock ricky out. yea ricky was the lineal champ but when he fought manny i'm not sure he was looked at as the best in the division and a fight with malignaggi should of maybe happened before the mayweather fight

[turbotime]

Mayweather vs Cotto should not be mentioned in the same sentence as Pacquiao-Bradley. Pacquiao vs Bradley is an actual good fight, it's a competitive fight going in.

If Cotto had two wins over top 10 JMW's, instead of two shot to pieces bums who are not part of the top 10, then this fight would have been more meaningful. Right now it means nothing, it's Mayweather vs a glorified C class fighter for a lot of money. Pac vs Bradley is actually a good fight.

Pac/Hatton was NOT a 50/50 fight going in. Pretty sure Pacquiao was the favourite in that one.

Regardless of how close Hatton/Pac perceived to be compared to how close Floyd/Cotto is perceived to be speaks more to Floyd's perceived talent than the competitiveness of a looming Pac/Hatton bout. Be serious people.

[-Spinal-]

it was a great win in the sense that ricky was undefeated and believe it or not was considered a great fighter and it was a fight once again believe it or not that many people wanted to see.ricky hatton has always been overrated to me but that doesn't seem to make a difference what makes a difference is what the majority or the loudest people think just like whats going n with kirkland right now i honestly think he is overrated but yet people wanna see him fight sergio so if sergio eventually fights kirkland beats him there should be no complaining because kirkland is looked at to many as a threat i guess to sergio

I thought it was a great win, but I want to see what FeFist thinks about the win.


Because from his rhetorical question about who Bradley has fought at 147, I got the vibe like he was basically trying to shut down Bradley as a good win for Pacquiao because he doesn't have a top win at 147.

But I wanna see what he says about Mayweather-Hatton, which I thought was a great win. Hatton only had one fight at 147 which he almost lost. But like I said, I wanna see his answer.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

why, u said this fight is no good whats the point of watching it

I watch most boxing, even **** fights like this.

I just wouldn't pay for it. I'll stream it or download it the next day.

[letsgobrady]

I thought it was a great win, but I want to see what FeFist thinks about the win.


Because from his rhetorical question about who Bradley has fought at 147, I got the vibe like he was basically trying to shut down Bradley as a good win for Pacquiao because he doesn't have a top win at 147.

But I wanna see what he says about Mayweather-Hatton, which I thought was a great win. Hatton only had one fight at 147 which he almost lost. But like I said, I wanna see his answer.

oh o k i actually want to see this bradley pacquiao fight but ricky did win a championship at ww and bradley has not even tho i also thought that collazo won but being these forums years ago i remember how the majority thought ricky had won maybe because ricky was the name