Comments Thread For: Floyd Mayweather Jr. Says - I'll Fight "Five More Times"

[Weebler I]

If he fights Martinez quickly then I'd say he's fought him around his peak despite being 37 but Pacquaio I'd say is passed it but still one of the best fighters in the world this is of course assuming he fights them whilst they are still at the level they're at now.

He fought a few fighters passed their best, he fought some at their best. But a lot of the fighters he fought passed their best were still very capable, IMO.

That's fair comment I think.

Imo FMJ has managed his career very astutely and effectively, he has barely put a foot wrong inside or outside the ring.

I don't think he'll retire undefeated though, imo like most boxers he'll take that step too far in pursuit of the (needed in his case) pay-cheque.

[-Spinal-]

mosley wasn't even active for a year so he should be dropped by any credible ranking system anyway, but the ring had pac at 1. i'm sure some clowns had an inactive mosley at 1 but they have no credibility.

Pac was not the #1 WW. He beat an unranked DLH at 147 to enter the WW rankings. Then he beat Hatton at 140 to become the JWW champ in May 2009. Then he went back to the WW rankings when he beat Cotto at 145 in late 2009. Pacquiao didn't become the #1 WW until he beat Clottey, when him and Floyd strted trading back and forth with the #1 spot. Mosley was the #1 WW since when he beat Margarito til when he was beaten by Floyd. Nobody did anything to take that spot away from him.

[daggum]

He seems to be struggling with that.

not really. some guy said mosley was the number 1 welterweight. i proved him wrong with actual evidence. the ring and most credible sources had pac at 1 based on his victories over cotto, clottey, and hoya while mosely was inactive for more than a year thus dropping him from most rankings. you probably think global warming isn't real because a couple paid off scientists say it's not real.

[IronDanHamza]

because i got them from espn. i guess they aren't credible enough for you? yeah sorry i didn't go down to showtime/hbo and personally count the numbers like you. i actually trusted a source. omg.

Like me? Since when have I claimed anything about any numbers? That's all you. Mr. "I don't follow PPV numbers yet I spout them until I get asked for a source"

Ok, so.... I'm still waiting for this credible source. Do you have it?

[MurkaMan]

So, now you're saying it in fact is a fact that Mayweather will never fight Pacquaio? Just a second ago you said that's not what you're saying was a fact. Which one is it?

That is not a fact "That's how it works" So you're in agreement that based off scientific theory recorded in 2008 that Marquez will never fight Pacquaio again?

Get a clue, man. Seriously.

I find it hilarious that your bias and dislike is so strong that you are actually trying to claim that something that so obviously isn't a fact is a fact, based off Scientific Theory

Bro its stronger than u think...He's one of those guys that lie about having a secret source....The fact is, Pac has ppv numbers so bad, that Bob came out and said he will no longer release ANY ppv numbers....This guy is mad man....I take full credit...I destroyed him in his prime, but YOU ALL finished him coming off a loss from me!...Tell em to take his ball, and move along!...It only gets worse from here...he will say some racist insults, and get banned!

[daggum]

Pac was not the #1 WW. He beat an unranked DLH at 147 to enter the WW rankings. Then he beat Hatton at 140 to become the JWW champ in May 2009. Then he went back to the WW rankings when he beat Cotto at 145 in late 2009. Pacquiao didn't become the #1 WW until he beat Clottey, when him and Floyd strted trading back and forth with the #1 spot. Mosley was the #1 WW since when he beat Margarito til when he was beaten by Floyd. Nobody did anything to take that spot away from him.

are you talking about the ring? because pac was number 1 in the ring.

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th...rweight--2000s

there's a real fact.

[Ishy Aytan]

not really. some guy said mosley was the number 1 welterweight. i proved him wrong with actual evidence. the ring and most credible sources had pac at 1 based on his victories over cotto, clottey, and hoya while mosely was inactive for more than a year thus dropping him from most rankings. you probably think global warming isn't real because a couple paid off scientists say it's not real.

Mosley was the no1 welterweight when Floyd fought him. There was NO RING CHAMPION. But Ring ranked Mosley as no1 and Pac @no2.

The Ring champion has been vacant since when Floyd retired back in 2007. He was the last person to hold the 'Ring Championship' at 147.

[Ishy Aytan]

are you talking about the ring? because pac was number 1 in the ring.

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th...rweight--2000s

there's a real fact.

Thats not a fact! Ring Magazine is the official website for ranking! Get a link from Ring Magazine not from Boxrec.

[daggum]

Like me? Since when have I claimed anything about any numbers? That's all you. Mr. "I don't follow PPV numbers yet I spout them until I get asked for a source"

Ok, so.... I'm still waiting for this credible source. Do you have it?

so espn isn't a credible source? they reported the numbers as 1.3 million. if they are wrong take it up with them.

[IronDanHamza]

not really. some guy said mosley was the number 1 welterweight. i proved him wrong with actual evidence. the ring and most credible sources had pac at 1 based on his victories over cotto, clottey, and hoya while mosely was inactive for more than a year thus dropping him from most rankings. you probably think global warming isn't real because a couple paid off scientists say it's not real.

Yes, really.

You know Cyber Boxing Zone had Mosley the Lineal Champion at the time, yes?

The source that a lot of people go to when looking at the History of the Lineage?

That, amongst many other sources had Mosley as the Lineal Champion at that particular time. Therefore, what you are saying is a fact, is actually not a fact. Surprise surprise.