Manny says "Winner take all"

**PAC-BOY** · 03-18-2012, 02:55 PM

So it goes to the cards! And?

**cixthree** · 03-18-2012, 02:58 PM

Originally posted by PAC-BOY

So it goes to the cards! And?

Did you see the Manny/JMM 3 fight?

**Phenom** · 03-18-2012, 02:59 PM

Originally posted by cixthree

Did you see the Manny/JMM 3 fight?

but this not going to be a close fight at all its mismatch actually

**Roman Moreno** · 03-18-2012, 03:00 PM

Originally posted by cixthree

Did you see the Manny/JMM 3 fight?

Yes, I also saw the first Morales-Pacquiao fight and the first Mayweather-Castillo fight.

**tomhawq** · 03-18-2012, 03:01 PM

floyd-iots have been saying pacman is an easy fight.

why would you object to the winner take all if you're a floyd fan? isn't that ******?

just goes to show floyd apologists don't really mean it when they say floyd is da best.

they're terrified of pacman.

i've never seen the most dishonest, insincere fake fans in all my life.

**Phenom** · 03-18-2012, 03:03 PM

fuck Pacquiao fight Martinez at 154

**Khalid X** · 03-18-2012, 03:03 PM

It will never be winner take all, and outside of a 50-50 split (which is what it should be) I think the best solution would be to make it 45-45 and the winner takes the additional 10% (since Floyd is so confident and wants the bigger split).

**Light_Speed** · 03-18-2012, 03:06 PM

Winner takes all is not a serious professional offer for a prizefighter. Forget the judges, you can twist your knee or your ankle in the first round and lose by TKO.

**tomhawq** · 03-18-2012, 03:07 PM

45/45 split is just fine and the 10 goes to the winner.

now if you truly believe you're the best and you're sure to win the fight why would you object to it?

it simply doesn't make sense.

it's even embarrassing to object to it.

floyd da best has been ducking this offer. he'd rather not talk about it.

sportswriters need to step up and keep pounding pbf for this.

Manny says "Winner take all"