Anyone saying Sergio struggled...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IronDanHamza
    BoxingScene Icon
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 49445
    • 5,022
    • 269
    • 104,043

    #31
    Originally posted by El Vikingo
    I got 105-101 ,giving the 3rd to Macklin,all in all J.Ledderman got 103-103 what the **** is wrong with this guy?

    Comment

    • IronDanHamza
      BoxingScene Icon
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 49445
      • 5,022
      • 269
      • 104,043

      #32
      Originally posted by bojangles1987
      Have you ever been on this site after a Floyd fight? If Cotto wins 3-4 rounds, 60% of this site will say Cotto was robbed and Floyd shouldn't be in the top 10 p4p.


      It's not that bad.

      But most of the time people are over critical to a degree of both Mayweather and Pacquaio.

      Comment

      • mushahadeen
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 7964
        • 384
        • 321
        • 8,800

        #33
        Floyd struggling vs. a future HOF-er like Cotto is not the same thing as Sergio struggling vs. a current and future sheep herder like Darren Barker and Matty Mack.

        Comment

        • freedom213
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2006
          • 3388
          • 112
          • 164
          • 10,016

          #34
          I like Sergio Martinez and rate him highly but he has had competitive fights against opponents who were skilled but definitely not close to top shelf quality. Nothing against Macklin, Barker or Szinzurik those guys are what I would rate as B+ caliber but Im interested to see how Martinez handles the guys on the same level or at least closer to his level.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP