Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Where does Dariusz Michalczewski rank on the ALL Time LHW List?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Roman Moreno View Post
    No, I would have taken Roy in that fight.



    No, The Ring didn't have titles from 1989-2000. In 2001 they brought back the titles because of how unstatisfied they were with the sanctioning bodies title policies. And, in 01 they gave Roy The Ring title.

    So the Ring title went from Roy-Tarver-Johnson-Tarver-Hopkins-Calzaghe-Vacant-Pascal-Hopkins.

    The lineal title went from Dariusz-Gonzalez-Erdei
    I know they didn't bring it back until this past decade, but they still had Rankings correct?

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Atreyu Khalil View Post
      I know they didn't bring it back until this past decade, but they still had Rankings correct?
      They had Ring rankings all through out that time period. But, no Ring champs. Once they brought back the Ring title they gave it to Roy instead of Dariusz.

      Comment


      • #13
        he is top 3 in my book.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Halls of Fame View Post
          he is top 3 in my book.
          Top 3 what?

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Roman Moreno View Post
            Top 3 what?
            top 3 lightheavyweights of all time. He had more title defences than any other against very good competition. Archie Moore, Tunney and Michael Spinks are up there too.
            Im not a big Bob Foster fan, he is overrated.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Halls of Fame View Post
              top 3 lightheavyweights of all time. He had more title defences than any other against very good competition. Archie Moore, Tunney and Michael Spinks are up there too.
              Im not a big Bob Foster fan, he is overrated.

              Comment


              • #17
                49-0 is not a record for all time undefeated.just the heavyweight record............why do people keep saying that?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Larryx2011 View Post
                  49-0 is not a record for all time undefeated.just the heavyweight record............why do people keep saying that?
                  explain.......

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Atreyu Khalil View Post
                    explain.......
                    Chavez sr was 87-0 before he drew with sweet pea.

                    Sugar ray went on a 91 fight win streak after losing to lamotta.

                    main two examples.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by I_like_wendys View Post
                      Chavez sr was 87-0 before he drew with sweet pea.

                      Sugar ray went on a 91 fight win streak after losing to lamotta.

                      main two examples.
                      Ok I see what he was saying, I didn't understand. Also, Did Marciano hold the record first & Chavez & SRR never retired with a 49-0 record.

                      The point i said was that DM had a chance to match the record by Marciano and possibly retiring undefeated at 49-0 or 50-0

                      Chavez & SRR didn't retire undefeated
                      Last edited by Atreyu Khalil; 03-16-2012, 03:35 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP