Who has the better resume Pernell Whitaker or Manny Pacquiao?

[jtiger777]

whtajker, he beat james mcgirt, diosbelys hurtado, julio vasquez, pime azumah nelson, prime JCC, prime oscar (but robbed), rogrer mayweather (a tough fight for anyone)

they both have great resumes but whitaker' is better IMO

1. Vs Azumah Nelson. Lightweight title fight and Whitaker really took Nelsdon to school in this one. by UD12.

2, Vs Greg Haugen. IBF lightweight title fight. Made the tough and strong Haugen look like he was in slow motion.

3. Vs JC Chavez. Broke the consecutive wins mark of Chavez by way of a ridiculous draw in a fight Whitaker was clearly the better man for the WBC welter title.

4. Vs Jose Luis Ramirez II. There was no mistake in this 2nd fight as he completely dominated and outclassed the tough Ramirez.

5. Vs Buddy McGirt II. In this WBC welter title fight, he completely outboxed an outstanding fighter in McGirt.

6. Vs Jorge Paez. WUD12 in this lightweight title fight, he showcased his brilliant boxing and defensive skills.

7. Vs Buddy McGirt I. McGirt was a tough fighter with outstanding skills but Whitaker was just too much for him.

8. Vs Roger Mayweather. WUD12 for NABF lightweight title. Mayweather actually fought well but not good enough to beat the slick Whitaker.

9. Vs Juan Nazario KO1 for the IBF, WBA and IBF titles. Completely outclassed and overpowered a tough fighter.

10. Vs Anthony Jones. UD12. Great victory over an up to the point, undefeated fighter and agains showcasing those incredible defgensive skills of his

pacs best wins were against, barrera, moralles (who he lost to b4) and 3 controversey fights with JMM (i have him winning 1 of the 3), and i guess cotto???? all good but i dont see how this is better than pernell??????

[zab191]

Pac has the greatest resume in the whole boxing history....in terms of fighting at mannyweight.

[I Love Jesus!]

Yes, that's right. Had you looked carefully, you would have noticed that I have not stated any particular preference either way. I merely showed two videos so people can compare and make their own intelligent assessment as to who is the better boxer between the two.

cant really make that call off 1 fight

[I Love Jesus!]

" Adding Haugen, Paez, Pendleton, and Mayweather to your list only enhances the Sweet Pea argument."

The Truck

just curios why you keep signing your nick name to every post? we can all clearly see your name in your avatar every time u post. its in big bold letters.

[Ragnar Lothbrok]

pernell beats pac at any weight but pac has the better resume.

Plenty of fighters that are ranked higher that would get beaten by fighters with lesser resume.

Nevertheless,

Resume > Skills, talent, hypothetical greatness and one on one match ups.

I could see floyd beating some boxers in the ATG top 20 but that doesnt mean Floyd should rank higher.

I remember how old school vanguards love to use the resume defense when trying to be blatantly biased about ranking old school fighters much higher yet when a modern fighter clearly has the much more decorated resume than a older timed fighter, they want to abandon their Resume > over anything mantra.

Hypocrites.

stop trying to warp, twist, and RIG an argument to fit your agenda.

jake lamotta beat ray robinson. who did chavez beat that was better than ray robinson? that means that lamotta ranks higher than chavez?

dont be crooked for old fightes jab. How many times have i heard old school vanguards say Resume trumps one on one hypothetical match ups, talent, and perceived greatness?

Yet when a modern fighter is clearly more decorated than a older fighter, you use the argument floyd stan ***g*ts like to use for floyd against oldschool fighters.

Again, pernell beats pac at any weight, but you cannot deny pac has the greater resume.

Division Titles
Pac > Sweet Pea

More Wins (remember old school farts love to rep fightes with 150 plus wins)
Pac > Sweet Pea

Fighter of the Decade
Pac > Sweet Pea

More fighter of the Years
Pac >Sweet Pea

More knockout of the Years
Pac > Sweet Pea

More time p4p 1#
Pac> Sweet Pea

More Hall of Fame Wins
Pac > Sweet Pea


Again, i think pernell is the better boxer and would beat pac at any weight but that doesnt change the fact that pac is the more decorated fighter.

Pernell Whitaker only has ONE Hall of Fame Win in his ENTIRE CAREER:

vs Azumah Nelson

If you count the robbery against chavez, that's 2. That's it.


Pacquiao has how many hall of fame wins?

2x Morales
2x Barerra
2x Marquez
1x De La Hoya
1x Mosley

That's 8 HALL OF FAME WINS MINIMUM. If Hatton and Cotto get in, that's 10 FREAKING WINS VS HALL OF FAME BOXERS. Add his fighter of the decade, his reign has p4p king (been p4p 10 since 2003), multiple fighter of the years, knock out of the year, his longevity, his historic accomplishments, his star power,

its quite clear pacquiao has the much superior resume than Pernell. Again, I THINK PERNELL BEATS PACQUIAO AT ANY WEIGHT, but the fact of the matter is Pacquiao CLEARLY HAS THE BETTER RESUME THAN WHITAKER.

I know Pacquiao is polarizing, and saying somebody is better than pernell is boxing taboo, but Pacquiao's resume is clearly better than whitaker.


clearly.

/ this thread now.

[hugh grant]

Pac would beat Pernell and after the fight, some people would scream Pernell was robbed. History gives us all the answers. And Pac has the better resume.

Now end thread.

[Sweet Pea 50]

Pac would beat Pernell and after the fight, people would scream Pernell was robbed. History gives us all the answers. And Pac has the better resume.

Now end thread.

[Bull24]

It's Manny Pacquiao.

[teds]

whitaker all the way

[J-Smooth]

barrera>nelson
cotto>mcgirt
morales>ramirez