Is it ban worthy when pple dig out their own old threads all the time?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • deliveryman
    Your token white guy
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 7592
    • 362
    • 178
    • 15,510

    #11
    I think you deserve to be banned. Fucker

    Comment

    • Atreyu Khalil
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2005
      • 3283
      • 72
      • 96
      • 3,679

      #12
      Originally posted by deliveryman
      I think you deserve to be banned. Fucker

      Comment

      • Salardo
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2011
        • 1364
        • 135
        • 1
        • 7,933

        #13
        Originally posted by PAC-BOY
        There is life out there
        says a guy with 37000 posts to a guy who has not even 100 posts.

        Comment

        • Brother Jay
          Banned
          • Apr 2006
          • 1733
          • 201
          • 65
          • 1,890

          #14
          Originally posted by THE S0UL TAKER
          Some people post in their old threads all the time just to put them on page one again. They don't care about spamming NSB forum with their irrelevant (because very old) threads and I think this should be ban worthy.
          That is why I see suddenly a few threads on page 1 all the time which were started at least 3 or 4 years ago by the same person who now posted again in this thread just because they are so in love with their own thread.
          That is ****** cause non of us cares about a thread which is 4 years old cause the topic of the thread is not relevant right now.
          here is an example:http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=349715
          not even 2 years ago did anybody give a **** about this thread (only about 20 pple posted in it) and this guy digs out his own thread again. That is called spamming in my opinion.
          Vote on the poll
          You've obviously been burned by an old thread resurfacing.

          Its shouldn't be ban worthy and people should be able to post anything they want to.

          Are you seriously asking for more censorship? Isn't it bad enough on this site?

          Comment

          • The Ban Stick
            A solid stick of ban
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2003
            • 20334
            • 144
            • 373
            • 27,182

            #15
            Originally posted by THE S0UL TAKER
            Vote on the poll
            Uh. NO. Although I agree with the reason, I DO NOT agree with you 'userating". This does not go here. We don't take members suggestions for banning people and making rules. Read the sticky at the top of the page when you get back.

            Comment

            • The Ban Stick
              A solid stick of ban
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2003
              • 20334
              • 144
              • 373
              • 27,182

              #16
              Originally posted by Brother Jay

              Are you seriously asking for more censorship? Isn't it bad enough on this site?
              This is a privately owned forum. Censorship of what, Racism? Nationalism? Get real.

              Originally posted by Brother Jay

              Its shouldn't be ban worthy and people should be able to post anything they want to.
              There are forums for this. Not this one.
              Last edited by The Ban Stick; 03-01-2012, 09:25 AM.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP