Comments Thread For: Bradley Says Mayweather is The Best, Not Pacquiao

[hugh grant]

If Manny Pacquaio doesn't lose until he retires, he will remain P4P #1.The same applied for Mayweather in 2007.

The same applied for Bernard Hopkins when he lost his P4P #1 spot to Mayweather in 2005 by losing to Jermain Taylor.

This is generally how it works. This fact seems to elude you, unfortunately. I can't say I'm surprised.

It doesn't surprise me you can't accept that Pacquaio lived pretty much his entire career ranked behind Floyd Mayweather. And only became #1 P4P because Mayweather was no longer there.

But like I said, these facts genuinely mean nothing. It's a mythical rankings, it means nothing.

.

You see i address your hightlighted bit already but you dont seem to take anything onboard you dont want to. Pac wont neccesarily stay no1 p4p if he dont lose, as long as someone comes along who can do outstanding things and Pac doesnt continue to. That is hard though as Pac has raised the bar to a high level.

When p4p no1 and 2 fighters are miles apart in weight divisions, it can normally take something like a loss to get a changing of the guard.
But when the no1 and 2 are in and around the same divisions, fighting the same opponents you can get a better idea of who should be no1 and 2 by comparing performances against common opponents.
When Pac is destroying opponents better than Floyd, throw your rule book out of the window and move on with the times. There is no reason to not make a change when its obvious it needs to be changed. Stop making absolute statements you fanboy of Floyd with Pac would never have been no1 if Floyd didnt retire.....never ever in a million years become no1 no matter what Pac did or achieved, so long as Floyd didnt lose, because it dont reflect well on you with that level of blinkered thinking.
If the no1 spot was reserved for Floyd like you want the world to believe, Pac and every other boxer might as well just retired, instead of Floyd retiring.

OK you will never admit to yourself you are wrong we know that, so do yourself and everyone a favour and dissapear from this thread and get on with your life.

[IronDanHamza]

You see i address your hightlighted bit already but you dont seem to take anything onboard you dont want to. Pac wont neccesarily stay no1 p4p if he dont lose, as long as someone comes along who can do outstanding things and Pac doesnt continue to. That is hard though as Pac has raised the bar to a high level.

When p4p no1 and 2 fighters are miles apart in weight divisions, it can normally take something like a loss to get a changing of the guard.
But when the no1 and 2 are in and around the same divisions, fighting the same opponents you can get a better idea of who should be no1 and 2 by comparing performances against common opponents.
When Pac is destroying opponents better than Floyd, throw your rule book out of the window and move on with the times. There is no reason to not make a change when its obvious it needs to be changed. Stop making absolute statements you fanboy of Floyd with Pac would never have been no1 if Floyd didnt retire.....never ever in a million years become no1 no matter what Pac did or achieved, so long as Floyd didnt lose, because it dont reflect well on you with that level of blinkered thinking.
If the no1 spot was reserved for Floyd like you want the world to believe, Pac and every other boxer might as well just retired, instead of Floyd retiring.

OK you will never admit to yourself you are wrong we know that, so do yourself and everyone a favour and dissapear from this thread and get on with your life.

Name one instance where that has happened in recent years.

What you're saying is literally bull****



When have I ever said the P4P #1 spot is reserved for Floyd Mayweather? Please, quote me.

All these longwinded, frankly bull**** responses lead to the same thing you clearly can't accept;

The fact, that the only reason Pacquaio was ever P4P #1 was because Mayweather was no longer fighting anymore. That's a fact.

Again, it means little. Infact, it means nothing.

But, it is a fact.

It's genuinely hilarious how upset you are over that, though.