Who is taking more risk than the other
Collapse
-
Pacquiao is taking more of a risk but it isn't because he wants to...it is because he is such an inferior fighter when compared to Floyd that anyone Floyd fights will look like less of a risk than anyone Pac fights...Comment
-
floyd risky fights:
1.martinez
2.pac
3.bradley
4.cotto
pac risky fights:
1.martinez
2.floyd
3.bradley
4.marquez
1 is the most risky opponent for both
whoever is fighting bradley has the edge against the otherComment
-
nah floyd always pics the best easy fight out there that keeps his 0
floyd risky fights:
1.martinez
2.pac
3.bradley
4.cotto
pac risky fights:
1.martinez
2.floyd
3.bradley
4.marquez
1 is the most risky opponent for both
whoever is fighting bradley has the edge against the otherComment
-
and why would i do that?
bradley is a danger for both
what would u say
if floyd vs bradley
vs
pac vs cotto 2
whos taking more risk?
ur a dumbo by the wayComment
-
Yeah and he also might have used loaded gloves against Santos and Williams as well, but that didn't stop them from beating Margarito did it?Comment
-
more boxing fans think cotto can beat mayweather than pac can?!? i think you got your numbers wrong bro and check it again
I dont get your point on Alvarez???
anyway the poll results answer how posters here answer the TS but IMHO although Pac is taking more risk than floyd it does not mean in anyway cotto is not a risk for floyd and the fight between them promises something better than Mayweather's last 3 fights ...
104 fans think Cotto beats Mayweather, 66 think Cotto KO's him while 38 think Cotto wins a decision.
63 "fans" think Pac beats Mayweather
To answer your question, Roach made it perfectly clear that Cotto was too much of a risk at 154 (or whatever "mannyweight" they demanded) than Bradley who's a JWW that will fight at WW. Roach told everyone exactly how he felt. Like I said if Mayweather was fighting Alvarez and not such a threat like Cotto (according to Roach) than this thread would make sense. Cotto is too much of a threat for Pac at 154, just like Mosley as too good of a fighter for Pac. Let alone a fighter like Mayweather...
Why do you think I knew EXACTLY how the Pac De La Hoya fight would go? Freddie Roach. Too many people want to ignore his opinion on the matter because it doesn't suit there agenda. Many of the fake fans known as *******s agenda is that the JWW Bradley is a bigger threat when Roach already disagreed and told everyone just how it is. SO again, if Mayweather was fighting Alvarez, this thread would be justifiable and the trainer of the year Roach would agree.
Like I have said for years, Mayweather beats Cotto and will look good doing it, even at 154. Bob didn't make the fight between them when both where under Top Rank years ago for a reason. Bradley is a threat but lets be real, the dude doesn't have WW power and won't outbox Pac who is easily out boxed by great boxers. Funny how these *******s praise Bradley and give him this shot at beating Pac yet flip the script when talking about Mayweather, a fighter that is completely and uttely on every aspect of the game, BETTER than Bradley will probably every be and when I say better I mean the entire definition of better..
But hey, i'm excited. I'm buying Pac's fight this year. The first one since the Cotto mannyweight fight and that was just out of spite. Started disliking Pac since the ducking of Nate Cambell soup, aka Diaz fight....Last edited by WESS; 02-23-2012, 08:02 PM.Comment
Comment