Comments Thread For: Bradley Vows: Pacquiao Will Have To Kill Me To Stop Me!

[Rome-By-Ko]

Clottey never ran from Pacquiao, go re-watch that, what he did was go into a shell for most of the fight. He rarely ever opened up. He pretty much quit in my opinion. The thing is, Clottey's style is dependent on his opponent being in front of him after they're done throwing, so I can't imagine Clottey ever beating a fighter like Tim Bradley who will go in and out on him. Clottey isn't a counter puncher either, hardly ever counters.

Great post...

[Rome-By-Ko]

Ortiz is a different story as he's huge for the WW division, Bradley on the other hand is small and again...moving up. Also, there was no evidence of Ortiz not having the condition to go the 12, he was simply out classed and looked for a way out. The bold, I saw Pacquiao tire somewhat, show a bit of fatigue against Mosley, Margarito, Marquez...Bradley on the other hand has never shown stamina issues, so I'm surprised you would even say that. When it comes to conditioning Bradley is up there with the best of them.

He say's these things because he is not a fan of Bradley and has not truly followed his career..The things he is saying are evidence of that...

[bojangles1987]

He say's these things because he is not a fan of Bradley and has not truly followed his career..The things he is saying are evidence of that...

That's 98% of boxing fans apparently. The sh** people say about Bradley, they've clearly never seen him fight yet they act like they know all about how he will fight or what he is capable of.

[Rome-By-Ko]

That's 98% of boxing fans apparently. The sh** people say about Bradley, they've clearly never seen him fight yet they act like they know all about how he will fight or what he is capable of.

I agree,but their break downs describe Hatton or Clottey or even Cotto,and Bradley fights nothing like any of umm..

[Bombs]

Then death it is lol.

[The Gambler1981]

I have known Bradley for a long time, he isn't what you are making out to be.

His punching technique is terrible, wide and sloppy. Plus his defense isn't really that tight as he leaves himself open often, in part because his punches are often wide and sloppy.

Manny likely won't stop him although if Manny catches him like Holt caught him twice, he won't get let off the hook near as easy.

[Rome-By-Ko]

I have known Bradley for a long time, he isn't what you are making out to be.

His punching technique is terrible, wide and sloppy. Plus his defense isn't really that tight as he leaves himself open often, in part because his punches are often wide and sloppy.

Manny likely won't stop him although if Manny catches him like Holt caught him twice, he won't get let off the hook near as easy.

Quick question??Why has not one of his opponents been able to get out of the way of any of those sloppy shots your talking about??Oh and one more thing,why has Bradley dominated every single fighter he has been in with if he is not that good and is just some sloppy fighter??

Let's be honest,Cotto did not do that..Cotto Judah Clottey none of umm were dominate fighters at no point in their careers..So I think Bradley is what we make him out to be,because he has proved it...

[The Gambler1981]

Quick question??Why has not one of his opponents been able to get out of the way of any of those sloppy shots your talking about??Oh and one more thing,why has Bradley dominated every single fighter he has been in with if he is not that good and is just some sloppy fighter??

Let's be honest,Cotto did not do that..Cotto Judah Clottey none of umm were dominate fighters at no point in their careers..So I think Bradley is what we make him out to be,because he has proved it...

Get out of the way huh?

Holt countered the **** out of him twice~ Holt straight up had Bradley and didn't take advantage

Bradley dominating, dude you and I must be living in different universes or completely different deffinitions of dominating. Bradley is a good fighter and he wins rounds but he doesn't dominate.

Are you related to Bradley damn?

[Rome-By-Ko]

Get out of the way huh?

Holt countered the **** out of him twice~ Holt straight up had Bradley and didn't take advantage

Bradley dominating, dude you and I must be living in different universes or completely different deffinitions of dominating. Bradley is a good fighter and he wins rounds but he doesn't dominate.

Are you related to Bradley damn?

The definition of Dominate...to rule; exercise control; predominate...It does not say to KO..Are you saying Bradley did not dominate Holt??Careful how ya answer that...Maybe we see things differently,but if guy's are not winning rds I consider them to have been dominated..If the most rds ya opponent has is 3 to 4 rds he was clearly dominated(imo)...

Oh and I don't have to be related to a guy to use common sense...

[The Gambler1981]

The definition of Dominate...to rule; exercise control; predominate...It does not say to KO..Are you saying Bradley did not dominate Holt??Careful how ya answer that...Maybe we see things differently,but if guy's are not winning rds I consider them to have been dominated..If the most rds ya opponent has is 3 to 4 rds he was clearly dominated(imo)...

Oh and I don't have to be related to a guy to use common sense...

Bradley did not dominate Holt, he took advantage of Holt's inactiviety, he certainly wasn't impressive in that fight other than the fact he got up from that first knockdown.

Winning can be by an inch or a mile winning is winning, dominating is not the same. Winning a fight 12-0 by winning twelve rounds by an inch isn't dominating.

Dominating a fight to me isn't just doing well, it also entails being impressive in some way. I haven't found Bradley's wins overly impressive, sure he wins clear against some decent guys but to me it is almost always Bradley is just doing enough