Comments Thread For: Bradley Vows: Pacquiao Will Have To Kill Me To Stop Me!

[The Gambler1981]

Against Peterson he was fairly impressive~ you could call that dominating.

The rest of his wins against good competition or otherwise don't look like that.

[mathed]

That's 98% of boxing fans apparently. The sh** people say about Bradley, they've clearly never seen him fight yet they act like they know all about how he will fight or what he is capable of.

I agree,but their break downs describe Hatton or Clottey or even Cotto,and Bradley fights nothing like any of umm..

Yeah, I could understand if Bradley had like 2 losses and was hyped up to be this great thing but he has no losses and is a virtual unknown.

Alexander was supposed to starch him and he cried like a dinosaur and quit. Holt crushed him yet he got right back up and dominated the rest of the fight. Peterson, who turned out to be much tougher than most gave him credit for, got completely dominated against Bradley. He moves up in weight and dominates an undefeated KO artist in Abregu and people said he looked terrible while winning 11 rounds out of 12. After almost a year layoff, he comes back and destroys Casamayor, an older, past his prime Olympian, true, yet he had never been beaten up like he was against Bradley.

The kicker are the guys that say he is one dimensional and skill less. I mean how does any fighter, Bradley or not, earn million dollar paydays and dominate some of the highest ranked fighters in the entire world if he is a skill less bum? People can hate all they want but this dude is going to be the toughest fight that Pac has had in a long time.....and he ain't no Ricky Hatton either.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Bradley did not dominate Holt, he took advantage of Holt's inactiviety, he certainly wasn't impressive in that fight other than the fact he got up from that first knockdown.

Winning can be by an inch or a mile winning is winning, dominating is not the same. Winning a fight 12-0 by winning twelve rounds by an inch isn't dominating.

Dominating a fight to me isn't just doing well, it also entails being impressive in some way. I haven't found Bradley's wins overly impressive, sure he wins clear against some decent guys but to me it is almost always Bradley is just doing enough

Like I said we have different views of what a dominate performance is..I've never seen Bradley win rds by an inch(lol),he always clearly wins rds...Once again is ya winning 12 rds to 0 that's dominating your opponent..Only holding ya opponent to 3 or 4 rds is dominating him..Funny Bradley drop a bunch of his opponents and clearly beat them,yet ya say winning by an inch..I don't get it,you sure your watching Bradley and being objective??Cause to say Bradley just does enough to win,while he is clearly winning every fight he is in sounds suspect to me..

[The Gambler1981]

Like I said we have different views of what a dominate performance is..I've never seen Bradley win rds by an inch(lol),he always clearly wins rds...Once again is ya winning 12 rds to 0 that's dominating your opponent..Only holding ya opponent to 3 or 4 rds is dominating him..Funny Bradley drop a bunch of his opponents and clearly beat them,yet ya say winning by an inch..I don't get it,you sure your watching Bradley and being objective??Cause to say Bradley just does enough to win,while he is clearly winning every fight he is in sounds suspect to me..

I am a fan of Tim Bradley, I am being realistic.

Doing just enough to win in a couple or few more rounds than the other guy is winning clearly, but not dominating.

I can't recall one fight where I was like yea Bradley just wiped his ass with that guy. I can recall thinking Bradley won clear, I can recall thinking Bradley was the better man in each case, I can also recall just thinking that Bradley is missing something to truly put dudes in his dust.


Dominating is like oh that dudes doesn't belong in the same ring as the other guy, and honestly Bradley has never made me feel that.

I still like him though, I just don't see that sort of ability in him.

[Rome-By-Ko]

I am a fan of Tim Bradley, I am being realistic.

Doing just enough to win in a couple or few more rounds than the other guy is winning clearly, but not dominating.

I can't recall one fight where I was like yea Bradley just wiped his ass with that guy. I can recall thinking Bradley won clear, I can recall thinking Bradley was the better man in each case, I can also recall just thinking that Bradley is missing something to truly put dudes in his dust.


Dominating is like oh that dudes doesn't belong in the same ring as the other guy, and honestly Bradley has never made me feel that.

I still like him though, I just don't see that sort of ability in him.

Once again we just agree to disagree,no worry's tho..Opinions are like azzholes everybody has one..LOLCheers...

[jbpanama]

Gambler, Do U know the Current Vegas Odds, on the Fight???

[jbpanama]

Yeah, I could understand if Bradley had like 2 losses and was hyped up to be this great thing but he has no losses and is a virtual unknown.

Alexander was supposed to starch him and he cried like a dinosaur and quit. Holt crushed him yet he got right back up and dominated the rest of the fight. Peterson, who turned out to be much tougher than most gave him credit for, got completely dominated against Bradley. He moves up in weight and dominates an undefeated KO artist in Abregu and people said he looked terrible while winning 11 rounds out of 12. After almost a year layoff, he comes back and destroys Casamayor, an older, past his prime Olympian, true, yet he had never been beaten up like he was against Bradley.

The kicker are the guys that say he is one dimensional and skill less. I mean how does any fighter, Bradley or not, earn million dollar paydays and dominate some of the highest ranked fighters in the entire world if he is a skill less bum? People can hate all they want but this dude is going to be the toughest fight that Pac has had in a long time.....and he ain't no Ricky Hatton either.

I like Brad, as a Live Dog, if the # makes sense....
Definately a Tough Fight for Pac!!!

[Phil Ivey]

Flipping Diaz almost goes the entire fight with him, Cotto beaten to a pulp lasted with him (could have finished on his own accord), Mosley at 38 went the distance with him, JMM at 36 or whatever went the distance with him (came very close to beating him).

So all you guys think Bradley is gonna get KO'd and beaten to a pulp? It is sure going to be a great shock when Bradley looks remarkable in contrast to the preconceived notions that so many posters have about him.

Uhh... haven't you stated numerous times that Pac would KO or stop Mayweather.. oh the irony.

[The Gambler1981]

Gambler, Do U know the Current Vegas Odds, on the Fight???

Haven't seen I assume Bradley will be like +400.

[FrenchDeLaHoya]

or just get a UD..

take it easy timmy, your last fight was against a casmayor that tested positive for marijuana. wonder who you fight after? ortiz? lol.