Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wladamir Klitschko versus Holyfield (the one who beat Tyson)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Bloodshed
    Since Wlad is so anxious to fight small fighters (trying to now fight Toney and Byrd), how would he do against a really good and strong small fighter in Evander Holyfield '96/97?
    wlad is 6'6", everybody's a small fighter compared to him.

    wlad by UD.

    Comment


    • #22
      We saw what Brewster did to him, so height dont mean shyt against Wlad. All that matters is if you can reach his chin.
      Originally posted by TheEvilSaint
      wlad is 6'6", everybody's a small fighter compared to him.

      wlad by UD.

      Comment


      • #23
        Holyfield would have KOed Wlad IMO.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Bloodshed
          We saw what Brewster did to him, so height dont mean shyt against Wlad. All that matters is if you can reach his chin.
          im not saying that wlad would have won simply cuz of his size. im just saying, wlad is the 2nd tallest HW champion of all time at 6'6" (2nd to his brother vitali at 6'7"). and him being so tall, something like 95% of the other HWs are "small fighters" compared to wlad.

          keep in mind, brewster hits much harder than holyfield ever did.

          but wlad's performance against peter IMO was one of the most spectacular performances in terms of technique. i think wlad couldve beaten damn near any HW ever with that technique.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by TheEvilSaint
            im not saying that wlad would have won simply cuz of his size. im just saying, wlad is the 2nd tallest HW champion of all time at 6'6" (2nd to his brother vitali at 6'7"). and him being so tall, something like 95% of the other HWs are "small fighters" compared to wlad.

            keep in mind, brewster hits much harder than holyfield ever did.

            but wlad's performance against peter IMO was one of the most spectacular performances in terms of technique. i think wlad couldve beaten damn near any HW ever with that technique.
            yeah by getting his ass knocked 3 times, and 9 times in last 6 fights, no doubt he can beat any heavyweight with that technique

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by The_Greatest
              yeah by getting his ass knocked 3 times, and 9 times in last 6 fights, no doubt he can beat any heavyweight with that technique
              yes, wlad was KDd 3 times by peter, but he still won.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by TheEvilSaint
                yes, wlad was KDd 3 times by peter, but he still won.
                If only Peter has defensive skills, he would be the hope for the heavyweight division...with good defense and good offense

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by The_Greatest
                  If only Peter has defensive skills, he would be the hope for the heavyweight division...with good defense and good offense
                  if only this and if only that, peter DIDNT have defensive skills and thats why he couldnt beat wlad.

                  there are things you have and things you dont have and peter doesnt have any defense.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    HE ALMOST LOST THE FIGHT ON POINTS AND HES THE BOXER!!!!!!!!!
                    Originally posted by TheEvilSaint

                    but wlad's performance against peter IMO was one of the most spectacular performances in terms of technique. i think wlad couldve beaten damn near any HW ever with that technique.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Holyfield would beat Wlad into a commatic OBLIVION IN TA 3rd round!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP