Since Wlad is so anxious to fight small fighters (trying to now fight Toney and Byrd), how would he do against a really good and strong small fighter in Evander Holyfield '96/97?
wlad is 6'6", everybody's a small fighter compared to him.
We saw what Brewster did to him, so height dont mean shyt against Wlad. All that matters is if you can reach his chin.
im not saying that wlad would have won simply cuz of his size. im just saying, wlad is the 2nd tallest HW champion of all time at 6'6" (2nd to his brother vitali at 6'7"). and him being so tall, something like 95% of the other HWs are "small fighters" compared to wlad.
keep in mind, brewster hits much harder than holyfield ever did.
but wlad's performance against peter IMO was one of the most spectacular performances in terms of technique. i think wlad couldve beaten damn near any HW ever with that technique.
im not saying that wlad would have won simply cuz of his size. im just saying, wlad is the 2nd tallest HW champion of all time at 6'6" (2nd to his brother vitali at 6'7"). and him being so tall, something like 95% of the other HWs are "small fighters" compared to wlad.
keep in mind, brewster hits much harder than holyfield ever did.
but wlad's performance against peter IMO was one of the most spectacular performances in terms of technique. i think wlad couldve beaten damn near any HW ever with that technique.
yeah by getting his ass knocked 3 times, and 9 times in last 6 fights, no doubt he can beat any heavyweight with that technique
HE ALMOST LOST THE FIGHT ON POINTS AND HES THE BOXER!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by TheEvilSaint
but wlad's performance against peter IMO was one of the most spectacular performances in terms of technique. i think wlad couldve beaten damn near any HW ever with that technique.
Comment