Props to Pacquiao for taking on Bradley.

[Bushbaby]

He does have a point.. That's an ugly baby.. I am sure he is beautiful to you.. But why would you even have that as your avatar..You are just making yourself a freakin target, and then you are goin to go all ape **** if somebody has an opinion...

Your mother is also a whore.

[mikemurni]

Your mother is also a whore.

Alright fine.. I am sure she's a bundle of joy..

[HeroBando]

My point is that Bradley isn't much better than Broner on paper accomplishment wise aside from title defenses.

Except that Bradley defeated 4 top 10 contenders in a strong weightclass. Meanwhile Broner fights in a sorry div, and his best win there is Jason Litzau.

[Bushbaby]

Alright fine.. I am sure she's a bundle of joy..

Listen do not quote me again. I see no reason to talk to punks that bring a child into grown up discussion.

[mikemurni]

Listen do not quote me again. I see no reason to talk to punks that bring a child into grown up discussion.

Sure.. But for what is worth I apologize for that remark it was immature..

[HeroBando]

He does have a point.. That's an ugly baby.. I am sure he is beautiful to you.. But why would you even have that as your avatar..You are just making yourself a freakin target, and then you are goin to go all ape **** if somebody has an opinion...

GTFO. I don't often agree with this guy, but the baby is cute as a button. And even if you disagree, it's as cheap a shot as it gets.

[mikemurni]

GTFO. I don't often agree with this guy, but the baby is cute as a button. And even if you disagree, it's as cheap a shot as it gets.

Ah shut up...

[nutz_n_ya_face]

You claiming to be a boxing fan is a non sequitur.



I'm not selling anything nor do I feel the need to persuade you to see the truth. I highlight the path but you can only walk it by being honest with yourself.

"Real boxing fans shouldn't"?

You've got to show that you know something beyond Pacquiao or Mayweather before you start calling yourself real, my man.



Well don't judge everyone else by your own ****ty standards! Just because YOU cannot find a con with a Bradley fight doesn't mean that others haven't expressed valid reasons as to why a Bradley fight is yet another attempt by Pacquiao and the Bobfather to avoid getting Manny's reputation anymore diminished by another loss.



It absolutely won't fill those holes. And BTW, when you admit that you're attempting to fill holes, you're admitting that you absolutely did avoid accomplishing something that you now have to fix.

Also, where Raheem and Guzman are now has no bearing on whether they would have beaten Pacquiao back then or not.



Proceed.



Ohhhh .. so Cotto is washed up despite him being Pacquiao's first choice??? You do know that Pacquaio tried to make that fight by dehydrating Cotto down to WW, right? And what does what you're willing to pay for have to do with the validity of a fight? LOL .. do you think there is a poll or a voting system? This isn't American Idol, my man.



It didn't stop Pacquiao before and it sure was said by REAL boxing fans for years! A fight against Ortiz at the SAME EXACT WEIGHT that Floyd fought him at would be LEAPS AND BOUNDS above a Bradley fight.



The Ortiz/Berto fight was a candidate for FOTY. What are you talking about? Berto is the IBF champion at WW. How is Bradley more dangerous and a better challenge. He isn't, plain and simple.



JMM beat Pacquiao. REAL boxing fans know that. All one had to do was watch the fight. Forget my opinion. Go watch the fight. The ONLY reason people don't want to see Pac/JMM IV is because they believe JMM will get robbed again.



He could meet Manny at 140lbs. Its just as bad as Bradley being a 140 pounder and JMM being a 135 pounder. Are you trying to have it both ways?



A bit extreme, but I wouldn't put it passed the Bobfather.



So is Broner. Not that I think that Broner would even be a viable fight. There was a point being made that went over your head. To go down in weight to jrWW, he might as well be fighting Broner coming up. His last fight was against a 135 pounder. So a fight against a 130 pounder would be ridiculous, but not out of the question for Manny Pacquiao.



I'm not looking for anyone to hail Mayweather as #1. We agree on that, but that was not the issue and beside the point. Peterson might be solid, but Alexander's one and only accomplishment was KO'ing Juan Urango. He did it in such beautiful fashion that the ENTIRE boxing world jumped the gun and called him the next big thing. Devon couldn't live up to the hype, but rode the wave until it fizzled out.

My point is that Bradley isn't much better than Broner on paper accomplishment wise aside from title defenses. I write this to express that Bradley is a solid boxer with all the right credentials for being at the top of his division. He still is not a credible challenge for Pacquaio. Mosley was once a LW. Does that mean that it would be ok for him to now fight Broner? You get the point.



I give you credit for sticking to your guns, but still we will agree to disagree. Its the same nonsense they pulled with Khan. Had Khan beaten Peterson, certain fanbases would be claiming that he was a P4P fighter despite him beating virtually no one of that would warrant such an accolade.

Bradley and Khan needed to fight each other. They didn't, and that left a big void in both resumes. There can be only one #1, and its Bradley. Still, he beat no one worth mentioning and he's a small guy who is #1 AT AND ONLY AT 140.

I respect the fact that you took time out to explain your position .. something most here do not .. and most likely cannot do. That alone puts you levels above the so-called "real fans" on this site.

come on hater. admit it alexander putting an @ss kickin' on Urango was impressive at the moment it happen tho.

[mikemurni]

come on hater. admit it alexander putting an @ss kickin' on Urango was impressive at the moment it happen tho.

nutz.. you owe babybush an apology.. That remark of yours on his baby was freaking low.. I admitted it... So you have to admit it too..

[nutz_n_ya_face]

You claiming to be a boxing fan is a non sequitur.



I'm not selling anything nor do I feel the need to persuade you to see the truth. I highlight the path but you can only walk it by being honest with yourself.

"Real boxing fans shouldn't"?

You've got to show that you know something beyond Pacquiao or Mayweather before you start calling yourself real, my man.



Well don't judge everyone else by your own ****ty standards! Just because YOU cannot find a con with a Bradley fight doesn't mean that others haven't expressed valid reasons as to why a Bradley fight is yet another attempt by Pacquiao and the Bobfather to avoid getting Manny's reputation anymore diminished by another loss.



It absolutely won't fill those holes. And BTW, when you admit that you're attempting to fill holes, you're admitting that you absolutely did avoid accomplishing something that you now have to fix.

Also, where Raheem and Guzman are now has no bearing on whether they would have beaten Pacquiao back then or not.



Proceed.



Ohhhh .. so Cotto is washed up despite him being Pacquiao's first choice??? You do know that Pacquaio tried to make that fight by dehydrating Cotto down to WW, right? And what does what you're willing to pay for have to do with the validity of a fight? LOL .. do you think there is a poll or a voting system? This isn't American Idol, my man.



It didn't stop Pacquiao before and it sure was said by REAL boxing fans for years! A fight against Ortiz at the SAME EXACT WEIGHT that Floyd fought him at would be LEAPS AND BOUNDS above a Bradley fight.



The Ortiz/Berto fight was a candidate for FOTY. What are you talking about? Berto is the IBF champion at WW. How is Bradley more dangerous and a better challenge. He isn't, plain and simple.



JMM beat Pacquiao. REAL boxing fans know that. All one had to do was watch the fight. Forget my opinion. Go watch the fight. The ONLY reason people don't want to see Pac/JMM IV is because they believe JMM will get robbed again.



He could meet Manny at 140lbs. Its just as bad as Bradley being a 140 pounder and JMM being a 135 pounder. Are you trying to have it both ways?



A bit extreme, but I wouldn't put it passed the Bobfather.



So is Broner. Not that I think that Broner would even be a viable fight. There was a point being made that went over your head. To go down in weight to jrWW, he might as well be fighting Broner coming up. His last fight was against a 135 pounder. So a fight against a 130 pounder would be ridiculous, but not out of the question for Manny Pacquiao.



I'm not looking for anyone to hail Mayweather as #1. We agree on that, but that was not the issue and beside the point. Peterson might be solid, but Alexander's one and only accomplishment was KO'ing Juan Urango. He did it in such beautiful fashion that the ENTIRE boxing world jumped the gun and called him the next big thing. Devon couldn't live up to the hype, but rode the wave until it fizzled out.

My point is that Bradley isn't much better than Broner on paper accomplishment wise aside from title defenses. I write this to express that Bradley is a solid boxer with all the right credentials for being at the top of his division. He still is not a credible challenge for Pacquaio. Mosley was once a LW. Does that mean that it would be ok for him to now fight Broner? You get the point.



I give you credit for sticking to your guns, but still we will agree to disagree. Its the same nonsense they pulled with Khan. Had Khan beaten Peterson, certain fanbases would be claiming that he was a P4P fighter despite him beating virtually no one of that would warrant such an accolade.

Bradley and Khan needed to fight each other. They didn't, and that left a big void in both resumes. There can be only one #1, and its Bradley. Still, he beat no one worth mentioning and he's a small guy who is #1 AT AND ONLY AT 140.

I respect the fact that you took time out to explain your position .. something most here do not .. and most likely cannot do. That alone puts you levels above the so-called "real fans" on this site.

Also, I'd pay Pacquiao fight Mayweather, Bradley, Broner, Marquez, Gamboa in that order.

I will never pay Pacquiao fight Cotto, Ortiz, Berto, I'm not sold in them because it wont be competitive. Them dudes doesn't have the skills that trouble Pacquiao. Skills pays the bills not size.

To me Mayweather, Bradley, Broner, Marquez and Gamboa would give Pacquiao trouble compare to Cotto, Ortiz or Berto at any weight class.

Size don't mean **** to Pacquiao, He is proven that he can take big punch.