Comments Thread For: Team Bradley: Khan Drama is No More, It's Pacquiao Time

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Leohappy
    Burning Fire!
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2011
    • 5801
    • 104
    • 127
    • 12,473

    #11
    there's no 'khan drama ' except the one bradley himself created.... by so obviously ducking, that even the WBC stripped him because he could provide no beliveable excuse for his vacation. bradley can just be happy khan lost to peterson which appeared to have raised his value.
    i congratulate bradley for getting that fight of course, but his chance of winning is very symbollic.

    Comment

    • Rome-By-Ko
      The winner Is
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 20157
      • 323
      • 332
      • 29,833

      #12
      [QUOTE=Moop;11770725]
      Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
      Tell um why ya mad son...LOL..

      Ahh you must think I'm a Khan fan?

      Nah... The $5m pay day is a very short sighted strategy for Bradley. Look at how the two Cash Kings of Boxing built their careers May and Pac- Dominating divisions they had big edges in and taking calculated and well time risks in those they didn't, this is neither.
      First your talking about a different time in boxing,When May and Pac where both on the come up boxing was a very different sport..Mayweather change the sport into what it is right now if ya wanna be real..Bradley is going for the gold,and why the hell not??He has a believe he can beat Pac and wants to prove it,and tbh I think he has a hella of shot to shock the world and beat Pac(weather the judges give it to him or not)so why not go for the dream??


      To say Bradley will be just like Clottey is just ****** and sounds more ****** when I said it another time..Bradley fights nothing like Clottey ,all he has ever done is win,he may not have power but he has smarts and I've never seen nobody walk threw Bradley punches either,so something must be there..When this fight is over(win or lose)Bradley's name will be better for have taking this fight and his options will be even better...Why not wanna fight a guy like Bradley at the top of the sport who,Maybe beat the best fighter in the world,or lost to the best fighter in the world..

      Comment

      • Kris Silver
        Kneel 4 Silver,good boy!
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 7796
        • 1,070
        • 3,576
        • 27,245

        #13
        Bradley's 0 is gona go.

        He might be wanting Khan then, as a first return defence of his WBO belt at 140 lbs, which Khan having avenged the Peterson loss may entertain.

        I think Bradley's ego is and will be too big to give a much bigger slice to Khan though, which Khan will want having regained a belt at 140 with a win, and Bradley coming off a UD loss.

        Comment

        • Vadrigar.
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2010
          • 8134
          • 517
          • 415
          • 20,350

          #14
          Bradley just wants his money and will soon run off. Exactly like Ortiz against Mayweather.

          Comment

          • The Devil
            Banned
            • Jun 2005
            • 1016
            • 163
            • 2
            • 1,327

            #15
            Tim Cowardly was just pimping his manufactured "0" out to the highest bidder. Pac Man vs Milk Dudley is just another Top Stank in house mismatch. BOYCOTT TOP STANK FIGHTS

            Comment

            • Vadrigar.
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 8134
              • 517
              • 415
              • 20,350

              #16
              Originally posted by The Devil
              Tim Cowardly was just pimping his manufactured "0" out to the highest bidder. Pac Man vs Milk Dudley is just another Top Stank in house mismatch. BOYCOTT TOP STANK FIGHTS

              Comment

              • ts33
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2010
                • 1220
                • 56
                • 91
                • 7,401

                #17
                Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                Yea but let's look how many undefeated fighters Bradley beat,who were also highly ranked fighters..How many did Khan fight??Umm yea none...Not one of his opponents in the top 5 where undefeated..He fought a bunch of older fighters,I can read the names on his resume..Bradley fought a gimmie ok,but I think he earned that,Khan fought Mccloskey Salita and Paulie M,all cake walks imo...
                Khan has lost to Peterson, so i'm not claiming Khans resume is better at all.

                If you read my post, i pointed out you said Khan had 'never fought someone with a pulse' before Peterson, and thats rubbish.

                Funny how much weight you give rankings Everyone knows rankings don't mean much.

                And if you do consider them so important, where is Bradley ranked at WW? And wasn't McCloskey a top 10 JWW? And wasn't Salita ranked #1 by the WBA (Khans mandatory in fact)?
                Last edited by ts33; 02-11-2012, 07:44 AM.

                Comment

                • Rome-By-Ko
                  The winner Is
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 20157
                  • 323
                  • 332
                  • 29,833

                  #18
                  Originally posted by ts33
                  Khan has lost to Peterson, so i'm not claiming Khans resume is better at all.

                  If you read my post, i pointed out you said Khan had 'never fought someone with a pulse' before Peterson, and thats rubbish.

                  Funny how much weight you give rankings Everyone knows rankings don't mean much.

                  And if you do consider them so important, where is Bradley ranked at WW? And wasn't McCloskey a top 10 JWW? And wasn't Salita ranked #1 by the WBA (Khans mandatory in fact)?
                  Yes but do you consider that highly ranked??So who was the fighter Khan fought that most thought he would lose to??Maidana and that's where it ends..Other then that he has never fought someone where there was a lot of people picking against him,because he has not fought many fighters with a pulse homie...Bradley was not expected to beat Witter or Holt or Alexander for that matter..All of umm was highly ranked as well..

                  Comment

                  • ts33
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 1220
                    • 56
                    • 91
                    • 7,401

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                    Yes but do you consider that highly ranked??So who was the fighter Khan fought that most thought he would lose to??Maidana and that's where it ends..Other then that he has never fought someone where there was a lot of people picking against him,because he has not fought many fighters with a pulse homie...Bradley was not expected to beat Witter or Holt or Alexander for that matter..All of umm was highly ranked as well..
                    Funny how you've ignored a lot of what i said. Don't go all politician on me, just answering what you want to answer

                    "i pointed out you said Khan had 'never fought someone with a pulse' before Peterson, and thats rubbish."

                    Maidana had a pulse, Judah had a pulse (you've been on NSB for a while, you know people were saying Judah had a good shot to KO Khan early), Kotelnik had a pulse (In the UK, not many people thought Khan would ever be a world champ after the Prescott KO ). Heck even Malignaggi had a pulse... style-wise he didn't match up well to AK, but you still give Bradley credit for winning fights where he had the edge stylewise.

                    But to answer your question, i don't consider guys like Salita/McCloskey to be that good, but on the same token you can't then justify guys on Bradleys resume to be good just because of their ranking, because thats just hypocrisy.

                    Oh and Bradley was expected to beat Alexander... After the Kotelnik fight most people saw Alexander differently
                    Last edited by ts33; 02-11-2012, 08:17 AM.

                    Comment

                    • voneric
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Aug 2008
                      • 747
                      • 42
                      • 0
                      • 6,887

                      #20
                      The Gamble Paid off for Bradley but it means nothing if he gets embarrassed by Pacquiao. I actually think Bradley will be Game and give Manny all he can handle however, i also feel that unless Bradley gets a KO, which is highly unlikely, he will not get a Decision. With Mayweather v Pacman still on the Horizion, neither man will lose on the Scorecards.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP