Comments Thread For: Bradley's Big Gamble Pays Off With Securing Pacquiao Tilt

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #101
    Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
    Was Paulie M a top 5 opponent??Let's see who's lying....
    I thought it was top 10, now you're changing to top 5. The answer is subjective anyway and bares no relevance to the discussion. You're just deflecting again.

    Comment

    • turbotime
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2011
      • 3897
      • 64
      • 0
      • 4,167

      #102
      Originally posted by joe strong
      i think they meant he took a gamble not taking the khan money which would have been his biggest payday. instead he turned down the fight in "hopes" of securing a fight with pacquiao even though it was not a sure thing. if he doesn't get the pacman fight he loses out bigtime financially.
      Sitting around hoping for a fight is not a gamble in this sport. It's the pussey way out.

      Comment

      • Mister Wolf
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2012
        • 7433
        • 241
        • 14
        • 107,507

        #103
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        In what universe did Khan need Bradley to fight Mayweather? Id love to hear an explanation for that one.
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        People have rationalised their minds to forget the Casamayor fight
        Its Funny Khan never tried to fight Holt or Alexander or Peterson but he was the number 2 in the division. Boxing a trip aint it Dirk.

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #104
          Originally posted by turbotime
          Sitting around hoping for a fight is not a gamble in this sport. It's the pussey way out.
          Lets not forget, the only reason he got the Pacquiao fight now is because Miguel Cotto turned it down. Bradley is just a back-up.

          He's like that half ugly girl that you might just settle for if you're still single and lonely when you're 50.

          Comment

          • Rome-By-Ko
            The winner Is
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 20157
            • 323
            • 332
            • 29,833

            #105
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            People have rationalised their minds to forget the Casamayor fight
            They also rationalised the Mccloskey fight..LMAO...

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #106
              Originally posted by Mister Wolf
              Its Funny Khan never tried to fight Holt or Alexander or Peterson but he was the number 2 in the division. Boxing a trip aint it Dirk.
              He fought Kotelnik in his first fight in the divison. The same guy who outclassed Alexander. He fought Peterson. And am I supposed to be blown away by the fact that Bradley fought Kendall Holt who should've never had a title in the first place and hasn't done jack ***** since.

              You were saying?

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #107
                Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                They also rationalised the Mccloskey fight..LMAO...
                Once again you demonstrate a painful lack of intelligence and draw the most ridulous comparisons. McCloskey was fight Khan took with the intentions of fighting Bradley next. Casamayor was a fight Bradley took with the intention of ducking Khan.

                Comment

                • turbotime
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 3897
                  • 64
                  • 0
                  • 4,167

                  #108
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  Lets not forget, the only reason he got the Pacquiao fight now is because Miguel Cotto turned it down. Bradley is just a back-up.

                  He's like that half ugly girl that you might just settle for if you're still single and lonely when you're 50.
                  LOL. You speak truth on this, Dirk.

                  Comment

                  • turbotime
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 3897
                    • 64
                    • 0
                    • 4,167

                    #109
                    Originally posted by Mister Wolf
                    Its Funny Khan never tried to fight Holt or Alexander or Peterson but he was the number 2 in the division. Boxing a trip aint it Dirk.
                    Uhh...he just fought Peterson? Went to his hometown to do it.

                    Comment

                    • turbotime
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2011
                      • 3897
                      • 64
                      • 0
                      • 4,167

                      #110
                      What's so great about Holt anyways? I think Paulie would outbox him badly.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP