Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Bradley's Big Gamble Pays Off With Securing Pacquiao Tilt

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
    Was Paulie M a top 5 opponent??Let's see who's lying....
    I thought it was top 10, now you're changing to top 5. The answer is subjective anyway and bares no relevance to the discussion. You're just deflecting again.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by joe strong View Post
      i think they meant he took a gamble not taking the khan money which would have been his biggest payday. instead he turned down the fight in "hopes" of securing a fight with pacquiao even though it was not a sure thing. if he doesn't get the pacman fight he loses out bigtime financially.
      Sitting around hoping for a fight is not a gamble in this sport. It's the pussey way out.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
        In what universe did Khan need Bradley to fight Mayweather? Id love to hear an explanation for that one.
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
        People have rationalised their minds to forget the Casamayor fight
        Its Funny Khan never tried to fight Holt or Alexander or Peterson but he was the number 2 in the division. Boxing a trip aint it Dirk.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by turbotime View Post
          Sitting around hoping for a fight is not a gamble in this sport. It's the pussey way out.
          Lets not forget, the only reason he got the Pacquiao fight now is because Miguel Cotto turned it down. Bradley is just a back-up.

          He's like that half ugly girl that you might just settle for if you're still single and lonely when you're 50.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
            People have rationalised their minds to forget the Casamayor fight
            They also rationalised the Mccloskey fight..LMAO...

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Mister Wolf View Post
              Its Funny Khan never tried to fight Holt or Alexander or Peterson but he was the number 2 in the division. Boxing a trip aint it Dirk.
              He fought Kotelnik in his first fight in the divison. The same guy who outclassed Alexander. He fought Peterson. And am I supposed to be blown away by the fact that Bradley fought Kendall Holt who should've never had a title in the first place and hasn't done jack ***** since.

              You were saying?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
                They also rationalised the Mccloskey fight..LMAO...
                Once again you demonstrate a painful lack of intelligence and draw the most ridulous comparisons. McCloskey was fight Khan took with the intentions of fighting Bradley next. Casamayor was a fight Bradley took with the intention of ducking Khan.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                  Lets not forget, the only reason he got the Pacquiao fight now is because Miguel Cotto turned it down. Bradley is just a back-up.

                  He's like that half ugly girl that you might just settle for if you're still single and lonely when you're 50.
                  LOL. You speak truth on this, Dirk.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Mister Wolf View Post
                    Its Funny Khan never tried to fight Holt or Alexander or Peterson but he was the number 2 in the division. Boxing a trip aint it Dirk.
                    Uhh...he just fought Peterson? Went to his hometown to do it.

                    Comment


                    • What's so great about Holt anyways? I think Paulie would outbox him badly.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP