Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley: Pacquiao is Not The Bigger Man in The Fight
Collapse
-
You must not follow boxing then, because ring weight is brought up all the time, e.g Floyd vs Baldomir weight, Castillo vs Floyd.
Every HBO fight I seen where they have the ring scales they comment on it and the advantage of it.
Even commentary teams that don't have ring scales guess a fighters ring weight, saying one fighter looks much bigger on the night.Comment
-
Whatever way you slice it Pac did not look good against Mosley not at all he struggled to land clean failed to cut of the ring efficiently missed a boat load of punches.
Granted Mosley came to survive and its hard for anyone to look good against a fighters who is only there to survive but most people expected better against a 40 year old who hadn't won a fight for 2 years and clearly had nothing left.Comment
-
Bull. Totally different scenarios. Go look at D4's post. Bradley isn't going back to 140, plus he fought at higher weights previously. Further, you were clearly referencing PBF fighting Hatton at 147 while PAC fought Hatton at 140. I have not seen too many people disparage Floyd for fighting Hatton at 147 on its own, but people do say that PAC's win vs Hatton was better because it was at Hatton's natural/best weight. That is obviously the point you were trying to make. And it's bull...No, What does Mayweather fighting Bradley has to do with this? does this world get dumb every freaky day or what? "My comparism" is people saying Hatton was too small for Mayweather at 147 two or three years after they fought, Am saying those same people are going to be talking about how Bradley was too small for Pac at 147...Understand?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment

Comment