Comments Thread For: Roach Views Cotto as Much Tougher Foe Than Tim Bradley
Collapse
-
Comment
-
I don't know. Maybe or maybe not but Pac hasn't fought a young, prime,undefeated fighter in like EVER. Pac skills ain't even been looking good against older guys. Funny how people said Pac would destroy JMM in the 3rd fight too. Just because Pac is the bigger name don't mean he is going to be dominate.I think Manny will KO Bradley. Bradley doesnt pose a threat to Manny with his soft hands, Manny will attack Bradley with no fear because of this. I dont think Bradley can outbox Manny because of Manny's speed and combinations.
Cotto poses more of a threat based off experience and his power, not to mention Cotto has already been in the ring with Manny and knows what to expect.Comment
-
What "fellow *****s"? I don't have any fellow anything...
As for fighter of the decade my all time favorite fighter was awarded fighter of the decade, so I don't know how that relates to Roach viewing Cotto as a much tougher foe than Bradley.
I know you're a little slow, but keep on tucking chief!Comment
-
Comment
-
I'm curious to know. How is this possible when Floyd has been ranked over Pacquiao at 147 for the longest and Pac fought everyone after him? Pac didn't beat Mosley when he was number 1 but rather ducked him. Pac didn't fight Berto,Ortiz..... no one that was coming off of a dominate win at 147. His best win was Cotto at 145 catch weight? Floyd has no title fights at catch weights. Pac fought Margarito for a title at a 150 catch weight who was not ranked in the division while Floyd beat De La Hoya at the full limit of 154 and will be fighting Cotto at the full limit of 154 for another title. Floyd technically became the Lineal champion twice but didn't want Mosley WBA title. How is Pac resume better? Not making this a Pac/Floyd thing but rather would like to hear you explain this. And please don't bring up the fighter of the decade argument because that's an award. Pac got beat up by JMM at a 144LB catch weight while Floyd toyed with that dude. Can't wait for Pac to retire and take his cheerleaders with him changing history and rearranging facts.Comment
-
lol, youre denying your affiliation with the ***** nation now?...id does not realte but im just pointing out that *****s are clebrating roach'scomment as if floyd just won FOTD....What "fellow *****s"? I don't have any fellow anything...
As for fighter of the decade my all time favorite fighter was awarded fighter of the decade, so I don't know how that relates to Roach viewing Cotto as a much tougher foe than Bradley.
I know you're a little slow, but keep on tucking chief!
......
Comment
-
Comment
-
this topic has been done to death....why dont you just make a poll and see if floyd can compete..I'm curious to know. How is this possible when Floyd has been ranked over Pacquiao at 147 for the longest and Pac fought everyone after him? Pac didn't beat Mosley when he was number 1 but rather ducked him. Pac didn't fight Berto,Ortiz..... no one that was coming off of a dominate win at 147. His best win was Cotto at 145 catch weight? Floyd has no title fights at catch weights. Pac fought Margarito for a title at a 150 catch weight who was not ranked in the division while Floyd beat De La Hoya at the full limit of 154 and will be fighting Cotto at the full limit of 154 for another title. Floyd technically became the Lineal champion twice but didn't want Mosley WBA title. How is Pac resume better? Not making this a Pac/Floyd thing but rather would like to hear you explain this. And please don't bring up the fighter of the decade argument because that's an award. Pac got beat up by JMM at a 144LB catch weight while Floyd toyed with that dude. Can't wait for Pac to retire and take his cheerleaders with him changing history and rearranging facts.
..
Comment
Comment