As I re-watched Peterson-Khan the victory looked clearer and clearer for Peterson, Oscar didn't win rounds against Tito for spoiling, unfair for Khan to as well. The british commentators, like myself, didn't award Khan with the 11th round, a round in which both landed the same amount almost, but Khan's holding, running, turning his back, pushing the head down, automatically gives the round to Peterson in my opinion. Can't see Khan winning that fight. As for Peterson-Ortiz, the draw was justified, and Ortiz who isn't a boxer choose to box, which put Peterson back in the fight. Had Peterson not been coming off a lay off and the fight were 12 rounds, Peterson would have taken it.
I respect Peterson, good fighter, much better credentials than Canelo or Guerrero, but Bradley is much more accomplished and better all around, which is why I prefer Pacquiao goes that route but feel they may go another route, Peterson. It's how Arum rolls, same with Roach.
I respect Peterson, good fighter, much better credentials than Canelo or Guerrero, but Bradley is much more accomplished and better all around, which is why I prefer Pacquiao goes that route but feel they may go another route, Peterson. It's how Arum rolls, same with Roach.
Comment