Pacquiao is capable of knocking out Marquez in the first round!

[tracylee]

good post! i cant explain myself like u do. most pac fans are too thickheaded to get it thru their heads. it gets me angry lol



and no manny didnt win the last fight.. sorry but thats the truth. and also.. how do u lose all of your power after one rd? thats like tyson saying that people r going to be like what? yea right.

Thanks! Just chalk it up to being mouthy I dont get too angry with any of them til they start to put JMM DOWN in order to pump Manny UP! Theyre both good, with their own qualities, so putting one down to make the other look better isnt necessary.

[SalvaDominicano]

excuses for everything. i agree with the judge that had it even but not for the judges who had is 110 - 115, 115 - 110. that was just bad. im sorry but theres no way manny won the fight even with the knockdowns. he got exposed in that fight and he better have learned some new things or else its going to be worse. better pray your boy isnt playin pool all night again.

[trinidadpr87]

pacquaio better not go out and try to knockout jmm or he will counter pac all night.

[tracylee]

excuses for everything. i agree with the judge that had it even but not for the judges who had is 110 - 115, 115 - 110. that was just bad. im sorry but theres no way manny won the fight even with the knockdowns. he got exposed in that fight and he better have learned some new things or else its going to be worse. better pray your boy isnt playin pool all night again.

I still dont get all the controversy over that judge scoring that first rd. a 10-7! The comission said that it was not mandatory to do that (deduct a pt. for every single knockdown), it is a judgement call (from what I remember). Even Harold Letterman scored it that way. I scored it a 10-6, and still had JMM the winner by a point!.

[JaNnO]

excuses for everything. i agree with the judge that had it even but not for the judges who had is 110 - 115, 115 - 110. that was just bad. im sorry but theres no way manny won the fight even with the knockdowns. he got exposed in that fight and he better have learned some new things or else its going to be worse. better pray your boy isnt playin pool all night again.

he admitted he made a mistake and ****ed up the result. but at least we have one thing to agree with, those two judges must be in both different fights. like i said some people saw the fight differently, so the issue must be settled in the rematch. yes he got exposed in that fight but i won't call him one-dimensional either. don't believe everything you read in the newspaper, or else you'll be in for a sucker! peace!

[SalvaDominicano]

I still dont get all the controversy over that judge scoring that first rd. a 10-7! The comission said that it was not mandatory to do that (deduct a pt. for every single knockdown), it is a judgement call (from what I remember). Even Harold Letterman scored it that way. I scored it a 10-6, and still had JMM the winner by a point!.

yea i scored it 10-6. a pt for every kd is the best way to score i think. more than 3 kds stop at 6.

[SalvaDominicano]

he admitted he made a mistake and ****ed up the result. but at least we have one thing to agree with, those two judges must be in both different fights. like i said some people saw the fight differently, so the issue must be settled in the rematch. yes he got exposed in that fight but i won't call him one-dimensional either. don't believe everything you read in the newspaper, or else you'll be in for a sucker! peace!

search this whole thread. i never once called in a one-d fighter. just said he got exposed.

[JaNnO]

I still dont get all the controversy over that judge scoring that first rd. a 10-7! The comission said that it was not mandatory to do that (deduct a pt. for every single knockdown), it is a judgement call (from what I remember). Even Harold Letterman scored it that way. I scored it a 10-6, and still had JMM the winner by a point!.

yes i believe it was not mandatory, but the judge was somehow confused by the commission on how to call on the 4-point dedection for the 3 kd's just before the fight. the judge after the fight admitted that pacman could have won the fight if he scored it correctly, which implied that he really saw it a 10-6 round if it wasn't the commission's conflicting notes about the rule. harold letterman had pac winning by 3 points ( i think).

[tracylee]

he admitted he made a mistake and ****ed up the result. but at least we have one thing to agree with, those two judges must be in both different fights. like i said some people saw the fight differently, so the issue must be settled in the rematch. yes he got exposed in that fight but i won't call him one-dimensional either. don't believe everything you read in the newspaper, or else you'll be in for a sucker! peace!

Yeah, with the pressure he was under, he would admit anything to shut people up...you gotta admit, quiet a fuss was made over a point! But, who's to say that it was a **** up, when its a judgement call? I can see scoring it a 10=7, easily! So I dont consider it a **** up at all; and if it had been reversed I'd say the same.
That poor judge had everybody and their mama coming down on him over a ****** point; while the other judge sat back with his rediculous score and nobody bothered him'
Hell, I'd admit to all kinds of **** with that kind of heat, and it makes me wonder what he REALLY, REALLY thinks of that score, and that round
when people crucify a judge over a POINT like that, it just makes a tough job tougher!

[JaNnO]

search this whole thread. i never once called in a one-d fighter. just said he got exposed.

no not you, just some jmm fans.