Who has the better resume, Mayweather or Cotto???
Collapse
-
-
Agreed. Ricky lost his only advantage when he moved up. And I think it had more to do with his mauling style then strength anyway. Plus, Floyd's strength is underrated.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Anyway, this all stemmed from people overrating the hatton win cuz he was a pfp ranked fighter.
If you're a mauler, you dont want to fight a master infighter at any weight, but at 147 it was a no hoper.Comment
-
And he was absolutely stronger than Mayweather. Hatton was pushing Mayweather back for a bulk of the fight.
Mayweather only really began even trying to back him up after numerous rounds of wearing him down with a mixture of making him miss and making him pay for being so reckless.
Mayweather's underrated strength meant he could stand his ground of course. But he wasn't stronger.
Hatton was the aggressor for the bulk of the fight, even when he was done in round 9 and 10 he was still the aggressor.
And Mayweather isn't stronger than Shane. Another myth. He suprised Shane and many with his strength, yes. People presume he's weak or not remotely strong. But Shane is certinaly the stronger of the two.
If Shane was a mauler like Hatton, he would be literally throwing Mayweather around the ring. The one time Shane showed a degree of mauling he threw Mayweather like he was a small child.Comment
-
But, he had just as much chance at beating Mayweather at 147 as he did at 140.Comment
-
But, Ricky's not even small at Welterweight though.
And he was absolutely stronger than Mayweather. Hatton was pushing Mayweather back for a bulk of the fight.
Mayweather only really began even trying to back him up after numerous rounds of wearing him down with a mixture of making him miss and making him pay for being so reckless.
Mayweather's underrated strength meant he could stand his ground of course. But he wasn't stronger.
Hatton was the aggressor for the bulk of the fight, even when he was done in round 9 and 10 he was still the aggressor.
And Mayweather isn't stronger than Shane. Another myth. He suprised Shane and many with his strength, yes. People presume he's weak or not remotely strong. But Shane is certinaly the stronger of the two.
If Shane was a mauler like Hatton, he would be literally throwing Mayweather around the ring. The one time Shane showed a degree of mauling he threw Mayweather like he was a small child.Comment
Comment