Who has the better resume, Mayweather or Cotto???

[SWEETSCIENCE100]

Cotto (147) Quintana, Judah, Margarito, Clottey, Mosley, Pacquiao
Mayweather (147) Judah, Baldomir, Hatton, JMM, Mosley, Ortiz
Cotto at Welterweight has a better resume.

Fights that you lost doesnt count son.
Cotto(147) Quintana, Judah, Clottey, Mosley
Mayweather (147) Judah, Baldomir, Hatton, JMM, Mosley, Ortiz

Mayweather by a land slide, not even close. Plus Mayweather dominated every round, two ended in KO's. The rest were one sided beatings. Cotto fights were all close, and without those low blows Cotto would have lost to Judah by ko!

[Da Boxer]

If you gents look at it objectively and look at the numbers provided with no biases the you goy the following:

Miguel Cotto
Opponents Total Wins: 644
Total Losses: 54
Their Winning Percentage: 93.615%

Floyd Mayweather Jr.
Opponents Total Wins: 778
Total Losses: 64
Their Winning Percentage: 91.744%

Based on that information ONLY Miguel has faced opponents with a better winning percentage.....and in theory, "better".

[SWEETSCIENCE100]

If you gents look at it objectively and look at the numbers provided with no biases the you goy the following:

Miguel Cotto
Opponents Total Wins: 644
Total Losses: 54
Their Winning Percentage: 93.615%

Floyd Mayweather Jr.
Opponents Total Wins: 778
Total Losses: 64
Their Winning Percentage: 91.744%

Based on that information ONLY Miguel has faced opponents with a better winning percentage.....and in theory, "better".

When your opponants are fighting bums winning Percentage doesnt mean ****. Who has Quintana fought, or who has Clottey fought at the time they faced Cotto?

[jrosales13]

If you gents look at it objectively and look at the numbers provided with no biases the you goy the following:

Miguel Cotto
Opponents Total Wins: 644
Total Losses: 54
Their Winning Percentage: 93.615%

Floyd Mayweather Jr.
Opponents Total Wins: 778
Total Losses: 64
Their Winning Percentage: 91.744%

Based on that information ONLY Miguel has faced opponents with a better winning percentage.....and in theory, "better".

[Guest]

When your opponants are fighting bums winning Percentage doesnt mean ****. Who has Quintana fought, or who has Clottey fought at the time they faced Cotto?

Quintana beat Julio who Dan Rafael was in love with. Clottey fought Margarito which was a big fight back in the day.

So it's not like either were nobodies.

I mean mayweather fought no one in 2008 and only Corley in 2004.

That's almost worse.

We won't even get into the triumvarite of Sharmba Mitchell, Corley, and Bruseles.

Which normally wouldn't be bad fights but floyd proved his worth, before and we demanded better so I feel like Floyd should be held to a higher standard, because he's a lot better.


To me it's almost more like who Cotto tried to beat versus who Mayweather didn't fight past 2003.

[MRBOOMER]

woulda, coulda should,..did'nt...

oscar was old and so were mayorga and margo but atleast cotto has a w over undefeated champion....

i'd rather have 2 beat up volkswagons and a new toyota than an old beat up porche...

Another David Diaz in a undefeated champ that one the title from a guy on a mega lay off

And when volkswagen my a$$ you mean busted crown Vic old Porsche beat that anyway

[Mr. Fantastic]

Cotto huggers going hard on them nuts. Most pathetic group of fanatics I've ever seen. Even worse than Vargas'.

[Phenom]

Cotto huggers going hard on them nuts. Most pathetic group of fanatics I've ever seen. Even worse than Vargas'.

I see where your coming from man this **** is getting ******ed now

[Johnwoo8686]

I at first thought Cotto had the better resume but after thinking about it some more I would have to go with Floyd. The only person that Cotto has on his resume that Floyd still needs is Manny Pacquiao. Floyd has fought more Hall Of Famers, more undefeated fighters, and has beat champions in more weight classes than Cotto has. Too bad I can't change my vote but I'd go with Floyd by a slight margin. If he were to face Pacquiao and beat him than his resume beats Cotto's by a huge margin.

[jrosales13]

I at first thought Cotto had the better resume but after thinking about it some more I would have to go with Floyd. The only person that Cotto has on his resume that Floyd still needs is Manny Pacquiao. Floyd has fought more Hall Of Famers, more undefeated fighters, and has beat champions in more weight classes than Cotto has. Too bad I can't change my vote but I'd go with Floyd by a slight margin. If he were to face Pacquiao and beat him than his resume beats Cotto's by a huge margin.

Floyd resume is better than Cotto resume by a huge margin already.