Who has the better resume, Mayweather or Cotto???

[Guest]

floyd is trying to fight pac now.

pac's team is ducking , dodging , parrying the fight like they were pernell whitaker.

I told everyone that would listen it would be about money.

And it was.

None of the other bs was ever even relevant.

It was dough, from the beginning

[Phenom]

Cant believe this yall voting for cotto.Even oscar delahoya got a
better resume then cotto

read the names that voted Cotto its mostly *******s and if we are counting losses towards resumes Delahoya has the best resume in recent history shits on everybody else's resume

[Canadian_Bacon]

I don't think Cotto is great. I think it's good he took the risks.

Floyd could have done the same and come out a lot better.

he didn't take any risks at 140.

he took more risks than floyd at 147 but he kinda had to.

tbh i don't think they thought old mosley or clottey was risks.

it just turned out that way.

even marg fight..... i think they thought he was just gonna box marg's ears off.

cotto was as protected as any fighter.

it's just fighters who they thought he would beat easily.....he couldn't.

[Guest]

read the names that voted Cotto its mostly *******s and if we are counting losses towards resumes Delahoya has the best resume in recent history shits on everybody else's resume

DeLaHoya should be stricken from anyone's comparisons.

He was a part time fighter since 2003 he was just the cash cow.

All this bs about him being 154 champ was because of the Mayorga fight, and who didn't beat that guy when it mattered. Yes, Vernon Forrest, I am cursing you in your grave for this mess.

[Canadian_Bacon]

I told everyone that would listen it would be about money.

And it was.

None of the other bs was ever even relevant.

It was dough, from the beginning

that's fine.

whatever the reason is.

it's still a duck.

[Canadian_Bacon]

DeLaHoya should be stricken from anyone's comparisons.

He was a part time fighter since 2003 he was just the cash cow.

All this bs about him being 154 champ was because of the Mayorga fight, and who didn't beat that guy when it mattered. Yes, Vernon Forrest, I am cursing you in your grave for this mess.

vernon forrest is to blame for the 147 mess in the 2000's too.

[Guest]

he didn't take any risks at 140.

he took more risks than floyd at 147 but he kinda had to.

tbh i don't think they thought old mosley or clottey was risks.

it just turned out that way.

even marg fight..... i think they thought he was just gonna box marg's ears off.

cotto was as protected as any fighter.

it's just fighters who they thought he would beat easily.....he couldn't.

I think that happens a lot. Things don't turn out as planned.

But then again, you have to see it know it would happen.

Mayweather never attempted to see it until not too long ago.

[Mr. Fantastic]

Mayweather's resume is overrated as fuck based on his greatness but it's still better than Cotto's.

[Guest]

vernon forrest is to blame for the 147 mess in the 2000's too.

Vernon Forrest is to blame for losing to Mayorga then Mayorga is to blame for losing to Cory Spinks.

Baldomir is to blame for beating scrub ass Judah who beat scrub ass Spinks while Margarito watched and waited to get a shot.

All under the guise of lineal champ.

SUch bs.

[Kagami Taiga]

So Mayweather was smarter than Cotto for not taking the risks?

Maybe

mayweather didnt take risks??? fighting Genaro Hernandez at the age of 21 with barely 10 professional fights wasnt a risk? or mebbe its fighting diego corralles after coming off a year break and a tune up with emmanuel augustus in which u had a rough outing? or how about moving to 135 to fight jlc, who had been on a tear through that weight class, even tho he outweighed u by more than 5 lbs. not a risk rite?? and then re fighting him after many thought u lost??? plz dude, dont come here with that. floyd took more than his share of risks before he was a mega star. same thing cotto did. except he lost. go argue with someone who doesnt know both fighters histories.