It's funny how stans conveniently sweep ignorance like the above article under the rug.
50/50 seems fair, but the fact of the matter is that the guy stated that he'd take a smaller purse to fight. Again, I reiterate that 50/50 is alright, but let's not act like the guy didn't backtrack for the 97th time. Mayweather called the guy out at the end of November and that article where guy makes the statement is from December 17th.
Thank you! I want to see Mayweather get beat up as much as the next guy. But (a) Pacquiao cant beat him and (b) these motherfu-kers are back peddling all over the place. Kudos to Uncle Bob on this one, he new Mayweather would never go for for 50/50, he's managed to shift some of the blame off of himself and Top Rank...Fu-kers!
In the F'ing phone conversation Pac said, 50/50 you have a deal. That was before this whole email ish came out.
The split had never been a problem It was 50/50 the whole time. OST was the issue not the split. The date/venue was the issue not the split. 50/50 was always OK. And, now that he had people on his side 50/50 is not OK?
I don't see how anyone can justify this or even try to make an excuse. But, OK whatever. If Pac accepts a lesser split then great. If not then make it 50/50 or just STFU with calling someone a punk or saying you only want one fighter.
Both fighters as great and as talented as they are. They're perfectly fine with making millions fighting lesser comp.
These are the same clowns that were saying Mayweather would still be scared and duck the guy... here they are now.... crying and complaining about it. The guy himself stated that he'd take a smaller purse. Mayweather called his bluff and now it's a problem.
The same way Mayweather called his bluff about cutoff dates and came off of his single request to make the fight and the guy still ran.
Both of them are fucking clowns, they can go and fuck themselves I don't care to see Pacquiao against Cotto or Mayweather Jr against Canelo ... They just want to keep making easy money.
Comment