Why do a lot of people think tysons power was overrated ? .

[RastaSmoker]

thats what i dont get ....he never fought anyone so he's not one of the hardest hitters..he may have fought alot of 2nd rate guys but most of them were only ko'd by Tyson ...or he was the 1st to do so

really. Name them

[RastaSmoker]

bump^^^^^^^^

[THE REAL NINJA]

really. Name them

like its that hard....1st we all know Holmes,Spinks,ruddock,stewart,williams,brono??,tub bs,biggs,thomas

[Verstyle]

you clearly no nothing about boxing. devastating punches thrown with great leverage make no noise. loud noises are from slaps. get a clue

actually thats a lie!!!!!!! u need to watch some of tyson fights and just listen and u will hear. like i said earlier jim lamply from hbo told the commentators to be silent jus so they can hear the difference in tyson punches from other heavyweights. and they literally shut up with no commentating for over a minute! if u dont believe me watch the jose rabalta fight.

[blockhead]

If tyson did hit harder than everyone in the division then why do we have *******s like holmes,thomas and berbick saying he didnt hit that hard ? .

holmes an *******? thats funny he was ten times the boxer tyson was and the only reason why tyson beat him was because he was old. comparing the tyson holmes fight to the tyson mcbride fight makes sense. tyson and holmes were both beaten by guys nowhere near their level of competition.

[Verstyle]

holmes an *******? thats funny he was ten times the boxer tyson was and the only reason why tyson beat him was because he was old. comparing the tyson holmes fight to the tyson mcbride fight makes sense. tyson and holmes were both beaten by guys nowhere near their level of competition.

whoa whoa whoa! u cant compare mcbride to holmes. a 45 year old holmes can beat a mcbride. and every1 knows holmes was still pretty good cause he kept on with his career for sometime later sooooooo he wasnt that shot. mcbride is no where near the caliber holmes is not even close.

[blockhead]

whoa whoa whoa! u cant compare mcbride to holmes. a 45 year old holmes can beat a mcbride. and every1 knows holmes was still pretty good cause he kept on with his career for sometime later sooooooo he wasnt that shot. mcbride is no where near the caliber holmes is not even close.

i wasnt comparing holmes to mcbride. i was comparing tyson to mcbride.

[THE REAL NINJA]

whoa whoa whoa! u cant compare mcbride to holmes. a 45 year old holmes can beat a mcbride. and every1 knows holmes was still pretty good cause he kept on with his career for sometime later sooooooo he wasnt that shot. mcbride is no where near the caliber holmes is not even close.

and holmes was still good enough to get title shots in 92 and 95

[THE REAL NINJA]

i wasnt comparing holmes to mcbride. i was comparing tyson to mcbride.

i could see camparing him to Sam ? but mcbride?

[Verstyle]

i wasnt comparing holmes to mcbride. i was comparing tyson to mcbride.

yeah i know i know. but u tried to make a comparision on why tyson did sorry to mcbride and why holmes did sorry to tyson. cause of age. and all im sayin is thats wrong cause holmes was a higher caliber then mcbride and continued his career after tyson. thats all