I would love to see a Pacman vs Cotto rematch

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PACsmash
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2011
    • 1140
    • 23
    • 2
    • 1,270

    #21
    Originally posted by gauze
    and i'm not saying i prefer this fight over any other match-up. i just wouldn't have that much of a problem with it. i dont think pacquiao wants to fight mayweather, so i'm taking that fight out of the equation. it's fantasy to me.
    i want to see cotto fight one more time against a different fighter.. and if he does well then maybe just maybe it would interest me to see a rematch with pac. but at this point based off cotto's performance with marg i do not want to see a pac vs cotto 2.

    Comment

    • PACsmash
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2011
      • 1140
      • 23
      • 2
      • 1,270

      #22
      Originally posted by gauze
      of pacquiao's list of opponents, yes i would choose this match. i have no interest in seeing him fight peterson or bradley. i feel that marquez beat him in all 3 fights and has nothing left to prove. i say give cotto his shot at revenge. and if the weight drain isnt an excuse, why did pacquiao need the catchweight to begin with?
      why not? peterson and bradley would be consider NEW opponents for pac. something different u know. and plus bradley is a young and undefeated fighter, why would u not want to see this?? and cotto fought clottey before pac at 146 and cotto won so please tell me how he wasnt weight drain in the clottey fight but was in the pac fight which was at 145, 1lb different? why didnt cotto fight marg at 154 then??

      Comment

      • Doctor_Tenma
        Monster
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 33313
        • 1,327
        • 1,249
        • 58,127

        #23
        Honestly, my only complaints is that he didn't fight Mayweather. I really couldn't care less if Pacquiao chose Cotto, win or lose, Cotto's gonna surprise a lot of people in the rematch, remember I said that.

        Comment

        • gauze
          white lives matter
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2008
          • 4186
          • 642
          • 328
          • 10,187

          #24
          ideally, i would rather see cotto clean up 154. him against kirkland/molina winner, alvarez, lara...all good fights

          Comment

          • Bushbaby
            Wild Apache
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 23513
            • 727
            • 370
            • 32,078

            #25
            This fight is garbage at welterweight. Pacman is a piece of work. The guy never fought Cotto at the limit, he needed a mannyweight. Now, after Cotto has made 3 fights at jrmiddleweight Pacman finally wants him at 147?

            People need to put 2 & 2 together. If team Pacman thought that Cotto was not a threat, they'd be fighting at 150 at the least. He fought Margarito at 150, why does he need to fight Cotto at 147, ya'll need to wake up.

            Comment

            • bMak
              Interim Champion
              • Jan 2009
              • 747
              • 40
              • 42
              • 7,079

              #26
              Originally posted by Box Up!
              Yes if pushed of course I’d like to see Manny fight Floyd, who wouldn’t? However, by no means do i see that fight, if it’s ever made, being anything close to competitive, I fail to see how Floyd would even lose a round. God how I’d love to be proven wrong though!

              No, a Cotto rematch would be sensational. 154 is too high but **** on the button at 147 is perfection.

              If you want to see a fight that is a nail biter, that swings back and forth and puts you through up to 36 minutes of unparalleled tension, then Pacman vs Cotto will provide it.

              Bring that **** ON.
              Trolling for Top Rank.

              Comment

              • gauze
                white lives matter
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2008
                • 4186
                • 642
                • 328
                • 10,187

                #27
                Originally posted by PACsmash
                why not? peterson and bradley would be consider NEW opponents for pac. something different u know. and plus bradley is a young and undefeated fighter, why would u not want to see this?? and cotto fought clottey before pac at 146 and cotto won so please tell me how he wasnt weight drain in the clottey fight but was in the pac fight which was at 145, 1lb different? why didnt cotto fight marg at 154 then??
                i think the peterson fight is a mismatch.

                now the bradley fight, i could see this one being cut short due to pacquiao's southpaw stance and bradley's dome. pacquiao tends to leap in at times and i could see that being a NC. also, i just don't find bradley that entertaining.

                making weight is difficult for some of these guys, something as miniscule as 1 pound can make a world of difference. i'm not cotto so i don't know how much effect shedding off that extra pound would have but it definitely didn't benefit him.

                i dont know why he didn't fight margarito at 154. my guess is that he wanted to minimize margarito's fight night weight or just to play mind games. i don't feel that the catchweight was necessary in that fight

                Comment

                • Bermuda
                  potential friend
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 5108
                  • 240
                  • 13
                  • 11,493

                  #28
                  Originally posted by AnimalisticMeth
                  Only at 154 because Cotto can't make 147 anymore.
                  but cotto himself has said that he can make 147 lbs comfortably. cotto is a small jr middleweight.

                  imo though, i'm not really sold on a pac vs cotto rematch only because I think it will be the same result. cotto may perform a bit better considering he has a more experienced trainer, but I still see him losing.
                  Last edited by Bermuda; 01-16-2012, 11:41 AM.

                  Comment

                  • PACsmash
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 1140
                    • 23
                    • 2
                    • 1,270

                    #29
                    Originally posted by gauze
                    making weight is difficult for some of these guys, something as miniscule as 1 pound can make a world of difference. i'm not cotto so i don't know how much effect shedding off that extra pound would have but it definitely didn't benefit him.

                    i dont know why he didn't fight margarito at 154. my guess is that he wanted to minimize margarito's fight night weight or just to play mind games. i don't feel that the catchweight was necessary in that fight
                    I understand cutting weight is hard but ur comparing 1lb different. If cotto wasnt drain at 146 I don't see how all of a sudden at 145 he's drained? Or is it because he lost to PAC instead that's why he was drain?? If cotto would have won would we still see the weight drain excuses?

                    Comment

                    • KingTito
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2006
                      • 9391
                      • 234
                      • 350
                      • 22,960

                      #30
                      I'd rather see Cotto-Mayweather if Pacquiao-Mayweather doesn't get made.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP