Cotto might ask for 20Mills Guarantee for a PAc Fight at 147

[check hook]

If true, good for him. His contract has expired and he has realised he has leverage. JMM will want a big guarantee to do it a 4th time, and now Cotto is wise to the fact he can get some more dough. This put's Manny into a corner where he would have to fight Bradley or Petersen.

[heat27]

aint that how it always goes?

yea he gets credit for foreman, people just have short memories/or werent fans at the time. like how people try to talk **** on floyd for fighting shane, well i remember people screaming for floyd to fight shane as he was ranked #1 ww and his last fight was a great win at the time. sunday morning he's all the sudden old and shot to pieces, Lol

So true lol

[bMak]

Yep

A lot of people on this site pick foreman to win and than after the fight they acting like they knew all along cotto was going to beat him lmao

Wasn't just here. I was at Dogh...whatever, at the time and most picked the upset there too.

[Phenom]

lol at people making Foreman out to be like a beast he was the weakest belt holder point blank period

that fight was the equivalent to Pacquiao vs Diaz actually that was the original plan too

[Phenom]

I always used to be amazed at how Arum gets away with these **** match ups but I have to give the man his props he made Cotto beating a one legged vacant belt holder look like great win to hardcore boxing fans

[120]

No one is saying Foreman was a beast, but the fact remains that a lot of posters here HAD Foreman winning because he had a good boxing ability and was too big.

[changuito242]

I always used to be amazed at how Arum gets away with these **** match ups but I have to give the man his props he made Cotto beating a one legged vacant belt holder look like great win to hardcore boxing fans

Lol this post is 100% true. A big reason Arum is rich because he's good at convincing people that crappy fights are actually worthwhile, and that crappy fighters are dangerous opponents. He gets away with this stuff cause people are dumb enough to eat it up. I love Cotto but the Foreman win was nothing.

[el malo]

No one is saying Foreman was a beast, but the fact remains that a lot of posters here HAD Foreman winning because he had a good boxing ability and was too big.

Lol this post is 100% true. Even pac turned down a fight with foreman because he was too big.

[heat27]

lol at people making Foreman out to be like a beast he was the weakest belt holder point blank period

that fight was the equivalent to Pacquiao vs Diaz actually that was the original plan too

No1 was making him out to be a beast

People were calling cotto shot and foreman style will cause problems

[HardAss]

cotto should go for floyd instead....he has a better chance of winning than a pac rematch....

YEA cotto stands no chance against the catchweight king

manny the fraud pedquiao aka the filipines number 1 duck