If Mayweather announces a Guerrero bout next week...

[papilucca]

why not Miguel Cotto?

[p4p-champ]

Guerrero is a good boxer, a very good fighter; but even though he is a legit opponent, he just hasn't accomplished enough to warrant a Mayweather bout. The funny part about all this is that people will bitch their asses off if Guerrero is chosen when he is the fighter that will give Mayweather a more competitive fight than Canelo. Saul will be an easy fight for Mayweather.

From a financial standpoint, Canelo is the guy, from a pure boxing perspective, Gurerro is the guy. But, Money talks, Saul will be the chosen fighter facing Mayweather on May 5th, 2012.

Meanwhile, Pacquiao continues to hide behind Arums shield and has his balls locked up in his wife's purse.

[4Corners]

If Floyd or Manny aren't fighting Sergio, and I said time and time again that they should feel no obligation to, than I would have liked Floyd to fight Cotto at 154 lbs.

I will accept Alvarez, but not like it.

Mayweather beats Canelo by UD (118-110, 119-109).

[gmc_rfc_06]

The big fight is being made impossible by the other side so I'm not really fussed either way.

[Champ Is Here]

Everybody has opinions on who it should be. Atleast he not fighting the same fighter 4 damn times

[TheGreatA]

Disgust. .

[Weebler I]

Disgust. .

At last.

It's one thing saying a Pac fight can't be made, it's quite another choosing Guerrero as an alternative.

Cotto, Canelo, Ortiz, Berto, Martinez...ahead of the lightweight.

[Drunk Punch]

I'd be reasonably happy. Guerrero is a good fight.

[Weebler I]

I'd be reasonably happy. Guerrero is a good fight.

Do you genuinely see it being competitive? I don't, that's why I don't see it as a good fight.

I liked the choice of Mosley, not Ortiz initially (but he proved me wrong) but I can't see Guerrero being competitive at all, it will be a one-sided borefest imo.

[bojangles1987]

I wouldn't like it. Guerrero isn't exactly a name at 140 or 147.