Grade Oscar De La Hoya's resume

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • turbotime
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2011
    • 3897
    • 64
    • 0
    • 4,167

    #21
    Originally posted by jrosales13
    Tell me you don't think it's a coincidence that Don King's biggest stars in the 90's were a part of the 2 most controversial decisions in one year.

    Comment

    • jrosales13
      undisputed champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 32632
      • 738
      • 763
      • 40,023

      #22
      Originally posted by turbotime
      Tell me you don't think it's a coincidence that Don King's biggest stars in the 90's were a part of the 2 most controversial decisions in one year.
      Oscar won a controversial decision that year, Oscar won a controversial decision 2 years earlier.

      You thought Oscar won, that's fine. I Don't, I don't think he won. I had Tito winning 7-5, other posters and writers had Tito winning, some had it a draw. But, if you had Oscar winning fine.

      But, if you want to take that L away from Oscar go ahead and do it. But, then take the W away from him in his fights with Whitaker and Quartey. Just like you did with Sturm.

      Comment

      • TyrantT316
        Willing to fight the best
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2003
        • 4013
        • 269
        • 2
        • 13,939

        #23
        Originally posted by Heeb
        His opposition, A

        His resume, B
        I agree with this.

        Comment

        • turbotime
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2011
          • 3897
          • 64
          • 0
          • 4,167

          #24
          Originally posted by jrosales13
          Oscar won a controversial decision that year, Oscar won a controversial decision 2 years earlier.

          You thought Oscar won, that's fine. I Don't, I don't think he won. I had Tito winning 7-5, other posters and writers had Tito winning, some had it a draw. But, if you had Oscar winning fine.

          But, if you want to take that L away from Oscar go ahead and do it. But, then take the W away from him in his fights with Whitaker and Quartey. Just like you did with Sturm.
          No I don't, I'm coherent enough to deal with it on a case by case basis. I admit that Sturm was brought in to set up Oscar for a belt and then go on to fight Hopkins. It is what it is. Just like Don King making sure his two biggest stars stayed out of the Loss column in 1999 when he got decisions for Holyfield and Trinidad against their biggest rivals Lennox and Oscar.

          Comment

          • IMDAZED
            Fair but Firm
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 42644
            • 1,134
            • 1,770
            • 67,152

            #25
            Pretty good - HOF worthy. Absolutely not ATG and not anywhere near the best of his era.

            Comment

            • NChristo
              The Keed
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 5606
              • 369
              • 149
              • 18,296

              #26
              Originally posted by Bombs
              The definition of a real man
              Agreed. Oscar is a real man if I ever saw one.



              I'd rate his Resume a B, decent, on him being robbed vs Tito I don't think he was, he swept rounds 5-8 but that was it, 1-4 were relatively close and 9-12 after Oscar put his track shoes on were Tito's.

              Comment

              • savorduhflavor
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Oct 2008
                • 8194
                • 288
                • 59
                • 14,875

                #27
                He gets credit from me for being in a position of power and still seeking out top competition.

                When your the top dog and everyone is after a fight with you it's easy to cherry pick and fight no hopers. But he sought challenges, I don't see how that can be denied. The man, in spite of the fact that he could sell 750,000 ppv buys fighting me, took a lot of risks.

                Comment

                • Walt Liquor
                  the opposite of pure
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 21667
                  • 913
                  • 1,369
                  • 40,313

                  #28
                  Originally posted by savorduhflavor
                  He gets credit from me for being in a position of power and still seeking out top competition.

                  When your the top dog and everyone is after a fight with you it's easy to cherry pick and fight no hopers. But he sought challenges, I don't see how that can be denied. The man, in spite of the fact that he could sell 750,000 ppv buys fighting me, took a lot of risks.
                  this is a great post. i too, respect oscar for that.


                  makes me wonder why you like floyd so much.

                  Comment

                  • revs1227
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 8039
                    • 255
                    • 279
                    • 15,341

                    #29
                    an amazing resume

                    Comment

                    • jrosales13
                      undisputed champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 32632
                      • 738
                      • 763
                      • 40,023

                      #30
                      Originally posted by turbotime
                      No I don't, I'm coherent enough to deal with it on a case by case basis. I admit that Sturm was brought in to set up Oscar for a belt and then go on to fight Hopkins. It is what it is. Just like Don King making sure his two biggest stars stayed out of the Loss column in 1999 when he got decisions for Holyfield and Trinidad against their biggest rivals Lennox and Oscar.
                      Then you're an idiot. Because the Oscar-Tito fight was just as controversial as the Oscar-Whitaker and Oscar-Quartey fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP