Maybe it's just a testament to how little having numerous title defenses means.
I mean, Dariusz was a good fighter. But, he's nothing special.
Look at this list of fighters with a long list of title defenses;
Johnny Nelson
Dariusz Michalczewski
Felix Sturm
Sven Ottke
Ivan Calderon
Virgil Hill
The list goes on and on. These are good fighters, but nothing special at all. I'd say some have arugments for the HOF. But none are locks, IMO.
I see all the time; "But he had 20 Title defenses" or using them as a reasoning as to why so and so is a great fighter. When there are fighters who are so far from great, with the same amount.
People say Hopkins is a Top 5 MW because he has 20 Title defenses. Bull****.
People say Calzaghe is an ATG because he has 21 Title defenses. Bull****.
If we are going to use that logic then the same must apply for every scrub like Johnny Nelson who racks up a long list of title defenses against mainly bums.
I mean, Dariusz was a good fighter. But, he's nothing special.
Look at this list of fighters with a long list of title defenses;
Johnny Nelson
Dariusz Michalczewski
Felix Sturm
Sven Ottke
Ivan Calderon
Virgil Hill
The list goes on and on. These are good fighters, but nothing special at all. I'd say some have arugments for the HOF. But none are locks, IMO.
I see all the time; "But he had 20 Title defenses" or using them as a reasoning as to why so and so is a great fighter. When there are fighters who are so far from great, with the same amount.
People say Hopkins is a Top 5 MW because he has 20 Title defenses. Bull****.
People say Calzaghe is an ATG because he has 21 Title defenses. Bull****.
If we are going to use that logic then the same must apply for every scrub like Johnny Nelson who racks up a long list of title defenses against mainly bums.
Comment