Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I watched Pac VS JMM 3 on Blue Ray quality and Pac Def Won.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    I watched it in 3d and think that jmm definitely won!!!! Whoever thinks Pacquiao won clearly, just like Pacquiao said, is clearly being bias!!

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by right_hand_lead View Post
      As much as I like JMM, he simply wasn't active enough.
      This

      Originally posted by TheSlickster View Post
      Sure he made Pac look silly in certain rounds that he def won but it doesn't mean he won most of them... Marquez gave the last two rounds away by his lack of activity. Berenstein was an idiot for telling Marquez to coast the 12th round as close as the fight was. You'd think Marquez would learn from Oscar's mistake against Trinidad.
      And this.

      Marquez landed the better punches, but he gave away a lot of the early and later rounds due to his constant backpedaling and inactivity.

      That being said, the fight was so close that to say either one of them won definitively is absurd. I watched the fight 3 times, the first time I had Pac winning by one round, second time I had him winning by 2, and third time I had him winning by one again. There were a lot of rounds were nothing significant was landed, but I had to give them to Pacquiao due to the fact that he was pressing the fight and throwing more.

      Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
      JMM will do better against Pac than Floyd will do. Because Floyd will be 100% counterpuncher. But FLoyd must know 50% offense is neccesary.
      If you think Mayweather is nothing but a counterpuncher you must not have seen a lot of his fights. To the contrary one thing I've noticed Mayweather does against aggressive fighters, such as in his last two fights against Mosley and Ortiz, as well as against Hatton, is after a few rounds of staying on the defensive while getting his opponents timing down, he pushes forward so as to keep them on the backfoot where they are unaccustomed to fighting.

      Pacquiao has no ability to fight going backwards, and once he is forced to retreat May will easily pick him apart.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by ChristianBale View Post
        So I saw the contrevesy in HD, but I used a software to convert the fight to the best quality avaliable and watched it on my 50 Inch Samsung with Nicam sound and 2 speakers for real life effects you could say.

        Some rounds were close, but clear cut. Some were close and 2 punches swayed the rounds.

        However Pac won on my scorecards by 2 rounds.

        It's easy to say on TV that a fight should be scored one way or another, but in real life as what the judges see, and I believe Blue Ray is the closest to real life.

        Sorry to say it but Pac won in a close fight, but it was clear.
        The deffinition does not matter unless you watched it on a 1 inch screen.

        Comment


        • #54
          LOOOOL i cant tell if this is a troll from a ***** pretending to be a ******* or if its for real

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by frosty-g View Post
            I just watched it on a 52" **** & Olufsen with 17 speakers and Pacquiao got bum ****d by Marquez, 12-0 plus an extra 5 or so rounds for the ones that were robbed in the first 2 fights.
            So sorry to say it but Marquez won by a massive margin, 17 rounds to 0.
            I watched it on my Sony 57" with Bowers & Wilkins speakers and Marquez got his a** beat I had it 7-5 to Pacquiao.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Check_hooks View Post
              lmao at marquez landing the cleaner harder punches when after the fight pac looked fine and Marquez looked like the elephant man

              Pac won 10-2, get over it noobs

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
                Huh? Boxing is scored by ring generalship, clean punching, and EFFECTIVE aggression. Marquez used the ring better and landed the harder punches. Sure Pacquiao was the aggressor but he wasn't very effective. You can't give a guy a fight simply because he came forward. Every poll I've seen on this fight had Marquez winning. Skysports had Marquez winning, and even Pacquiao's cheerleaders on HBO seemed unsure if Pacquiao actually won the fight.

                The reason why Marquez did not get the decision is because Pacquiao is the big moneymaker. If Marquez was the bigger star I guarantee you he would've been awarded the decision.
                this right hurrrr

                u can't dispute it unless you're a dumbass or a ****** *******

                Originally posted by ChristianBale View Post
                Primetime has such bad quality, and an amateur team that I would not dream of basing my own judgement on their broadcast. The Sentanta rejects are not worthy and they don't even have HD camera's.

                Now that they have lost Khan, it is even worse for them in gaining viewers and revenue for re investment. That with Frank Warren having his show will kill that channel off most likely within a few years.

                Most fans that give it to JMM are Americans and Mexicans. Americans generally are bitter towards Pac, either because of Mayweather are Arum. Most fans do always want the under dog to win, and sometimes close rounds are sympathy rounds. This should not be the case in a Championship fight in m eyes if at all.

                People need to step up to 50 Inches at least with some speakers. If you have a PS3 then I am selling some copies for 10 dollars and you pay the shipping. International shipping is available.

                Mods: Edit that part if I am not allowed to sell it.
                da ****k? you're on some real bull****

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by ChristianBale View Post
                  So I saw the contrevesy in HD, but I used a software to convert the fight to the best quality avaliable and watched it on my 50 Inch Samsung with Nicam sound and 2 speakers for real life effects you could say.

                  Some rounds were close, but clear cut. Some were close and 2 punches swayed the rounds.

                  However Pac won on my scorecards by 2 rounds.

                  It's easy to say on TV that a fight should be scored one way or another, but in real life as what the judges see, and I believe Blue Ray is the closest to real life.

                  Sorry to say it but Pac won in a close fight, but it was clear.
                  Uhhhh....dude....up scaling with using a container with a loss less codec does not somehow create an original raw uncompressed footage. Im assuming you DL somewhere online. Just FYI....even if you captured RAW footage straight from TV....on air only airs 720 as its the standard for over the air. 1080p would NOT be even possible unless HBO released a version of the fight.

                  P.S. Fight was a draw....nothing more nothing less

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Check_hooks View Post
                    lmao at marquez landing the cleaner harder punches when after the fight pac looked fine and Marquez looked like the elephant man

                    Pac won 10-2, get over it noobs
                    yeah by your dumbass logic Clottey beat Pac


                    learn boxing bruh....

                    stop sukkin pac's ****

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      oh hurrrrrrayyyyyyyy he watched it on "blue ray" ..... "Quality" ... and we get his opinion more than a month later .... I was falling from the edge of my seat ......

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP