Comments Thread For: Sulaiman on Mayweather: Beating a Lady, Not a Major Sin

[PacquiaoATG]

Jose Sulaiman, the head of the World Boxing Council sanctioning body is idiot! Lost respect on him! The guys stripped Timothy Bradley! How about the woman beater? WBC are lame wack organization!

[iloveboxing2]

Sulaiman is a ****ing hypocrite and the only reason why he's not stripping Floyd, which nobody really cares is because he just wants his org to be a part of Floyd/Manny bonanza. Jose stands for nothing, guys an idiot!

[EAAE]

The USA is plummeting, and will not exist in a few years time.

Once your dollar is imploded, which is on the very near horizon, your country, and infrastructure, will likely resemble a third world country.

Technically, the USA no longer exists, and neither does your constitution.

You live in the North American Union dude, not the USA.

Go and check up if you dont believe me, Bush sold you out years ago.

You have no idea what is going on in your own country, so I doubt that you have any accurate grasp of world politics.

NOTE: I am not happy about what I just said, it is tragic, but it is what it is.

bro dont try to educate this 'theprincess' fool, all he is is a racist pr!ck who in one thread (around pages 8-10) managed to insult Thais, ******s (well the whole Middle East in general but especially ******s), all third world countries, basically anyone who is not American, he should be treated as a joke and responded to in that manner because thats what he is, A JOKE.

[MTN]

One of the greatest achievements of the west is in the advancement of human rights. These advancements include the freedom to express opinions without the fear of someone knocking down your door to haul you away. Even though your opinions suck, and contradict civil rights (including women) you are still free to do so.

We do not subjugate women here, and it is a crime to hurt them. I pray for the women and other people that your kind oppresses and hope that someday they will also experience the freedom to speak up and tell you to get off your fkn a55 and help clean up your own house and country.

Shut up pu$$y! Keep acting all political and how you give a **** about human rights. The guys who are soo quick to defend womens rights and kiss there ass are usually the fuggin women beaters, *****philes, rapists and ******ers. Im just being real in how I want my women. And so is 2/3 of the world.

Go to any country that isnt dominated or heavily influenced/controlled by white people and you will see the beautiful women of these cultures act like real women, meaning they know and love to cook for there men, they love to nurture there children instead of send them off to daycares. Go to Africa, Asia and South America where all the real beauty is and you will see the men in these areas treat there women a whole lot better because of what they do for there husbands.

In these cultures, we dont send our parents off to retirement homes like you guys do. We actually take care of the old like they took care of when we were babies. My only view is that the women in western culture behave and act like trash. And usually the men who allow the women to talk and behave the way they do to there men are pu$$y whipped like Russian.

You dont like my view... Go **** yourself. I know what I want and Im not afraid to say it. Ask any real hard working man, and hell tell you he doesnt want to come home to a trashy girl who cant cook. I guess your ass is used to eating kraft dinner or microwave **** thats why you fully support the women. Its not equal rights in this society so stop watching and CNN. Woman have all the control.

[MTN]

There is no need to preach about Islam bro. There is absolutely no reference to Islam in my reply. I was replying to MTF who made no indication to his religion nor country. But I understand that you need to defend countries that are primarily Islamic - they generally have a poor record of oppressing women.

You are typical white trailer park trash if thats what you believe. Do you have any proof of this? Or is this what CNN and Fox news told you? Get off the couch and travel for once and see the world instead of what some douche bag shoves in your face!

Find some facts of dominant ****** countries oppressing women? Or you just following what all the other ignorant people are saying?

[EAAE]

There is no need to preach about Islam bro. There is absolutely no reference to Islam in my reply. I was replying to MTF who made no indication to his religion nor country. But I understand that you need to defend countries that are primarily Islamic - they generally have a poor record of oppressing women.

I am not ****** but am surrounded by them in my everyday life, and not one of them mistreats their wife, they have friends and go out like every other person, maybe you're watching too much TV and generalizing without actually knowing what goes on in other cultures, besides statistically most incidents of female abuse are alcohol related and only 2 ******s i know drink alcohol and they are young and arent married, so have a wild guess and tell me who gets drunk and beats their wife???????

[bertgaspat]

The comment of Mr. Sulaiman of beating a lady is not major sin is very disappointing. He must bear in mind that Mayweather is boxer with great skill and strength. Using this skill and strength against a helpless lady or a woman is a major sin. Imagine yourself in front of floyd who is very angry and ready to strike any moment. Will you not be afraid? Even floyd is not a boxer, or an ordinary man, beating a lady is a grave sin because you are hurting not only the physical body but also her feelings and inner mind, a very traumatic experience indeed. Mr. Sulaiman should not condone any wrong doings of a champion boxer like floyd in his stable. He should set an example that beating a lady or a woman by a boxer would be orstracized. His statements in favor of floyd means he is protecting floyd and giving notice to all boxers in the world that its okay to beat a lady.

[balintawak]

Trailer Trash?

You are typical white trailer park trash if thats what you believe. Do you have any proof of this? Or is this what CNN and Fox news told you? Get off the couch and travel for once and see the world instead of what some douche bag shoves in your face!

Find some facts of dominant ****** countries oppressing women? Or you just following what all the other ignorant people are saying?

All of the following countries have a dominant ****** population.

Afghanistan: Women who don't wear a burqa, will be shamed in public, spat on and even assaulted.

Iran: A woman can get a divorce but her children will be taken away from her, a woman’s job prospects are severely limited.

Lebanon: Proof of elementary education is required for women but not for men.

Saudi Arabia: Women are struggling to have the same status as men, and still cannot vote.

Pakistan: In the rural areas, women are like ****** subject to drudgery. They are there just to obey their fathers, brothers and husbands. They do not have the right to decide about themselves because women are considered foolish creatures according to the dominant social and cultural norms.

Indonesia: Women's usual working conditions include long hours, abusive environments, unhealthy conditions and restrictions on the right to organize.

Shall I continue?

These facts were easily available on the web. BTW, if you haven't noticed, I am Canadian and do not ascribe my information from very biased and right-wing propaganda like Fox News and other American networks.

Neither do I condone ****** bashing, but you and another poster were very defensive about your religion, and I'm sorry to repeat but the countries which are predominantly ****** are also some of the most oppressive against women.

With regards to your assumption that my background is akin to 'white trailer trash', you are very much mistaken because I am an educated professional and am not white. But based on your lack of reasoning skills and constant use profanity, perhaps you are the one who comes from an uneducated background.

[EAAE]

The comment of Mr. Sulaiman of beating a lady is not major sin is very disappointing. He must bear in mind that Mayweather is boxer with great skill and strength. Using this skill and strength against a helpless lady or a woman is a major sin. Imagine yourself in front of floyd who is very angry and ready to strike any moment. Will you not be afraid? Even floyd is not a boxer, or an ordinary man, beating a lady is a grave sin because you are hurting not only the physical body but also her feelings and inner mind, a very traumatic experience indeed. Mr. Sulaiman should not condone any wrong doings of a champion boxer like floyd in his stable. He should set an example that beating a lady or a woman by a boxer would be orstracized. His statements in favor of floyd means he is protecting floyd and giving notice to all boxers in the world that its okay to beat a lady.

I dont think Floyd was working behind the jab, then landed a big right cross to drop her for the count, but look man, he pleaded guilty and is doing time now for it, whatever the WBC do is there business, you act shocked that they are corrupt, its boxing who isnt? further more i doubt Floyd cares about getting stripped or not, this is about money with the WBC and what isnt about money these days, why so shocked? its like one day finding out that Bob Arum is actually the anti-christ himself, oooooooowwwwww big shock LOL

I dont condone Violence against women or anyone for that matter, he is doing the time for the crime, done.Violence against women, Australia says No

P.S. i am a firm believer in equal rights, EQUAL RIGHTS think about that

[balintawak]

Perspective?

Perspective you say ,,, punch kick strangle , she had NO marks on her at all and Floyd being a professional fighter that would break her in less than a minute I find that amazing , remember he was charged with assault for poking a parking cop with his finger , , hence " maybe " the mountain out of a mole hill , assault in law can be a scratch , maybe just a verbal or 1/2 beat to death its very wide bookends , and it all matters if you wanna be real about it , but if you wanna just hate on half a story thats your perspective .

He threatened his son , boy I brought you into the world I take you out ,,, its said everyday by many , is it truly assault or an upset father talking to his son , it really is all about perspective and you werent there and neither was I , so the perspective is you make judgment on half a story and I dont , could you be a hater just hating ,,,, probably !

He pleaded guilty to avoid a lengthy case , many people do this all the time even when they did not do all they are accused of but cant be bothered going through the costly procedure of proving innocence even though they may very well be innocent , just cant prove it , and their lawyer recommends a guilty plea rather than risk a severe judgment if you cant PROVE your innocence and many times that is very hard to do , innocent until proven guilty is a rort , in real life its often often the other way .

Perspective ,,, it does matter what she did and what she said , it always matters what both do in a altercation , women have a legal power over men that is abused my many day in day out , this could easily be the case seeing that she has admitted lying about being assaulted before .

Thats why I dont judge Floyd on this , Im neutral neither condemning him or supporting him , I was not there !

Since you are so keen on 'perspective', let's look at the grand perspective:
1. Ms Harris and Mr. Mayweather are estranged
2. Mr. Mayweather arrives to Ms Harris dwelling uninvited and unannounced
3. Mr. Mayweather is verbally abusive, assaults Ms Harris, and threatens his son
4. Mr. Mayweather leaves with cell phones belonging to Ms Harris and her children

You can draw out different perspectives and scenarios, but don't you think that Floyd, his lawyers and spin doctors have already analyzed every possible perspective? Floyd eventually decided to do the right thing. Yes, it would be difficult for Floyd to fight this case because the evidence is overwhelming - and he will lose.

If your perspective is neutral, then why do you only explore scenarios that serve to defend Floyd's actions? A neutral position will also look at the possibility that perhaps Floyd was filled with jealous rage when he went to see Ms Harris. Perhaps Floyd's current nature is egotistical, possessive, aggressive and occasionally violent. Is this such a far fetched possibility for you?

You also believe that if Floyd actually wanted to hit Ms Harris, she would have physical marks, and since you heard that there were no marks presented in court, it was impossible for Floyd to have assaulted her. Are you saying that Floyd is incapable of assaulting another human being without leaving marks? Your perspective leaves many gaps.

Floyd has to man-up and reflect on his own life. We all know that he disrespects his own father, the mother of his children, his own child, work associates, people who have to deal with him, the media, and these are just the people that we know about.

Defending Floyd's foolish behaviour is doing him a disservice, because it prevents him from reflecting on the way he is living his life. Hopefully, he can learn from this experience, and grow to be the person that is truly capable of being, and wouldn't we all want that?