Floyd by decision against anybody in history

[Oxn]

I think TS realized how ****** his thread was and is now back pedaling. "Oh thats your opinion bullcrap", when he is basically asking for your opinion, and states his own.

*****s, dont encourage this man.

[Mr.0pal]

Betting favorite = fighter who SHOULD win...so you aren't saying he WOULD beat anyone in history, but that he SHOULD beat any fighter in history, right? not much of a difference if you ask me

also, stake*

There's not much different between "Floyd should win" and "Floyd WILL win"?
If you say so.

[SirTomJones]

Sugar Ray beats him.

to name just one.

[RlCKY]

Whitaker is a smart choice. Again, I can't emphasize this enough.... I'm not saying "Floyd will beat anybody in history". All I'm saying is that he is the safest bet.... the most trustworthy IMO when big money is on the line. I'd have to pick Floyd over Sweet Pea.

Can you at least explain why you feel he is the safest bet? If that is your opinion that is fine, but at least offer up an explanation

[Mr.0pal]

I think TS realized how ****** his thread was and is now back pedaling. "Oh thats your opinion bullcrap", when he is basically asking for your opinion, and states his own.

*****s, dont encourage this man.

He was projecting his opinion as fact. Nobody can say Floyd WILL or WILL NOT beat anybody. I've clarified this in numerous posts. I knew idiots would come in talking about how this fighter or that fighter WOULD beat Floyd without a doubt. These are the dumbest humans alive.

[RlCKY]

There's not much different between "Floyd should win" and "Floyd WILL win"?
If you say so.

If you are always going to bet on the guy no matter who his opponent is, then you think he will win against anyone he fights. Same thing

[MrClutch85]

Duran at 135 I would bet against Floyd and Hearns at 147 I would bet against Floyd if he hit Floyd with the same right hand Mosley hit him with lights out fight over

[Mr.0pal]

Can you at least explain why you feel he is the safest bet? If that is your opinion that is fine, but at least offer up an explanation

Why the **** do you want to hear me say the same shat that you've heard millions of times about Floyd? It's a waste of valuable space.

his ring IQ
all around skill
timing
adjustment abilities

blah blah ****in blah!!!

I can't say that he WILL beat everybody... that's a ****** thing for anybody to say about any fighter. I'm saying that if forced to the wall and I had to pick one fighter to bet on it would be Floyd.

[Mr.0pal]

Duran at 135 I would bet against Floyd and Hearns at 147 I would bet against Floyd if he hit Floyd with the same right hand Mosley hit him with lights out fight over

You're braver than me.

[hugh grant]

Why the **** do you want to hear me say the same shat that you've heard millions of times about Floyd? It's a waste of valuable space.

his ring IQ
all around skill
timing
adjustment abilities

blah blah ****in blah!!!

I can't say that he WILL beat everybody... that's a ****** thing for anybody to say about any fighter. I'm saying that if forced to the wall and I had to pick one fighter to bet on it would be Floyd.

You pick Floyd because you rate him, but cant you understand that there are many who dont rate him as highly as you do, so wouldnt bet on him.
There are nearly as many people in this world who dont rate him, as do rate him.
Pac beats him,
all round ability
Speed and power
angles,
southpaw,
more experience over great fighters than Floyd and more battle hardened.
etc etc