Eubank or Froch - Who is better

[SirTomJones]

After reading this.

SMH! Chris Eubanks really? Froch>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chris Eubanks, yes Eubank was a solid fighter not great.

Wondering what does boxingscene think.



Chris Eubank





Carl Froch

[D-MiZe]

Eubank would splatter Froch.

He's got the power to seriously hurt Froch, he's the boxing ability to outbox Froch and he's got the unorthodox, unpredictable style to knock Froch clean out.

[SirTomJones]

Eubank would splatter Froch.

He's got the power to seriously hurt Froch, he's the boxing ability to outbox Froch and he's got the unorthodox, unpredictable style to knock Froch clean out.

Benn would have had him in row z if Taylor was able to put him on his arse.

[Weebler I]

It's pointless asking these questions where Froch is concerned.

Froch loses every fantasy fight ever.

I will say this much though - no one splatters Froch and no one probably will.

[Kagami Taiga]

eubank. no question in my mind. ****, nigel benn would have beaten froch as well imo.

[Gojira]

It's pointless asking these questions where Froch is concerned.

Froch loses every fantasy fight ever.

I will say this much though - no one splatters Froch and no one probably will.

This. He's like the exact opposite of Mayweather when it comes to fantasy fights.

[NChristo]

Eubank pretty clearly.

[The MiZ]

froch is too slow, even Eubank Jr would give him a run for his money lol

[D-MiZe]

Eubank is going to hit Froch with punches that he won't see coming. It's what got him dropped against Taylor and I really can't see him surviving against someone who hits as hard as Eubank. Albeit, Eubank's power at 160 was a lot better than 168 - but Froch is too open and careless to survive.

Eubank's uppercut would tear Froch's head off.

[PrinceNaz88]

It's pointless asking these questions where Froch is concerned.

Froch loses every fantasy fight ever.

I will say this much though - no one splatters Froch and no one probably will.

I agree completely with this.