Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

could Andre Ward go through Froch resume undefeated?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by K2ray View Post
    ^^^^^THIS^^^^

    And IMHO Bika is actually tougher & stronger than Froch.
    stronger maybe but tougher c'mon and noway is he a better overall fighter

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
      Don't be fooled by others, 50/1 you can't find a quote from me saying that phrase
      Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
      I've explained numerous times why I have taken the jab out
      Is this what you were looking for?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
        Is this what you were looking for?
        Is it that quote?

        1/50 you don't find it.

        Save yourself some time and don't bother looking, because it isn't there.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
          Taylor?

          I'm not sure if that's a serious question, but everyone was asking for Taylor to retire "before' the tourny started.

          Secondly, I don't see Dirrel or Pascal giving Ward problems.

          Well, maybe Dirrel, but I don't think Pascal will.
          I think Taylor gives Ward problems until his tires plus I don't think ward can stop him

          Comment


          • #35
            WARD has found fortitude of late early in his career when Froch was fighting the likes of Pascal i think i can see a loss on his record. But dabbling with the "What if" factor here.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Dudley View Post
              WARD has found fortitude of late early in his career when Froch was fighting the likes of Pascal i think i can see a loss on his record. But dabbling with the "What if" factor here.
              Froch's level of opposition was absolutely woeful until 3 years ago.

              Froch has fought better fighters than Ward but he has only been fighting quality opposition for around a year longer.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                Froch's level of opposition was absolutely woeful until 3 years ago.

                Froch has fought better fighters than Ward but he has only been fighting quality opposition for around a year longer.
                Is this a criticism or what? They've both had a similar number of fights if I remember correctly...?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Dirrell would be the only threat...athletically, Dirrell is Jones to Ward's B-Hop.

                  Then again, Dirrell also beat Froch and got robbed blind

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Brock Landers View Post
                    Is this a criticism or what? They've both had a similar number of fights if I remember correctly...?
                    No, it's not criticism. Like I said, Froch has the fought the better fighters.

                    But saying Ward had the luxury of easier fights earlier in his career as opposed to Froch is wrong considering Froch's level of competition was just as bad as Ward's up until the Pascal fight.

                    And Froch has only been fighting quality opposition a year longer than Ward.

                    That's all.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Brock Landers View Post
                      Is this a criticism or what? They've both had a similar number of fights if I remember correctly...?
                      It called being a spin doctor. Saying the same thing, "Froch level of opposition is better than Wards", but putting a spin on it to make Froch sound worst making Ward sound not as bad.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP