The idea is just ******ed. Pacīs technique will be sub-par forever, it is his artificially "enhanced" physical attributes what made Pac a fighter hard to beat.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Pacquiao the greatest counterpunching brawler ever?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostYou can always identify an idiot when you ask them to name a legit historian and they name Bert Sugar.
the keeper of the boxing HOF.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rassclot View PostI just named 2 of the absolute most respected boxing historians in the sport and d1ckhead here discredits both of them.
how do you even talk sense with idiots like this?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rassclot View Postyou can always see a mouth breathing monkey when idiots write off bert sugar who has been around to see all the greats.
the keeper of the boxing HOF.Originally posted by Rassclot View PostBert Sugar and Emmanuel Steward.
yes I did. mmmmmmmkay, stupid.
I mean, Bert Sugar is the one most idiots go for as the main historian. And it makes sense because he's pretty much the only one known in the mainstream.
But Emmanuel Steward?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BigStereotype View PostI didn't discredit anyone, I just said that Bert Sugar is more of a storyteller than a historian and Emmanuel Steward is respectable but is basically a paid Pacquiao lobbyist while he's on tv.
go pick up a book or something.
Comment
Comment